Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QMOMvsMIDETF Comparison
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) is part of the US Mid Cap Growth segment. QMOM's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. In contrast, MID's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. QMOM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.45% for MID. QMOM is up 6.95% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. MID performs worse with -2.45% YTD performance, and -$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QMOM and MID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QMOM vs MID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QMOM MID | -1.42%-3.45% | +3.70%-5.79% | +6.95%-2.45% | +24.83%+13.08% | +65.41%+45.99% | +32.73%+27.41% |
| Flows | QMOM MID | +$856K-$57K | +$6M+$3M | +$5M-$5M | +$18M+$7M | +$149M+$35M | +$182M+$62M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QMOM MID | +25.56%+18.68% | +24.70%+23.46% | +21.74%+19.94% | +24.64%+24.03% |
| Max drawdown | QMOM MID | -8.04%-7.41% | -14.73%-16.53% | -26.41%-23.84% | -26.41%-40.04% |
| Max drawdown duration | QMOM MID | 9d42d | 50d38d | 414d154d | 414d1060d |
QMOM | MID | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 2:55 PM | $68.01 | $62.90 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $69.79 | $63.10 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
QMOM | MID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.01 | $62.90 |
| 1D performance | -2.55% | -0.32% |
| AuM | $369.92 M | $89.22 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.45% |
QMOM | MID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Alpha Architect | American Century Investments |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 47 | 35 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 2, 2015 | July 15, 2020 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QMOM and MID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QMOM is up 6.95% year-to-date (YTD), while MID has lost -2.45%. That puts QMOM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QMOM or MID?
Year-to-date, the QMOM ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to -$5M for MID.
Which ETF is more volatile: QMOM or MID?
Over the past year, QMOM had a volatility of 24.7%, while MID experienced 23.46%.
Which ETF is bigger: QMOM or MID?
As of March 11, 2026, QMOM holds $369.92 M in assets under management (AUM), while MID manages $89.22 M.
What sectors do the QMOM and MID ETFs invest in?
QMOM leans toward sectors like Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, MID focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QMOM ETF and MID ETF?
QMOM top holdings include ENERGY FUELS, COEUR MINING INC and GB00BRXH2664. MID holds in its top three: CLOUDFLARE INC, JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL and MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS.
Which ETF is more diversified: QMOM or MID?
QMOM holds 50 securities with 30.45% of its assets in the top 15. MID has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 56.76%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
