QMOMvsFCUSETF Comparison
VS
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) is part of the Multi-Asset: Other segment. QMOM's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, FCUS's top sector exposures are Technology, Energy and Non-Energy Materials. QMOM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.28%, versus 0.8% for FCUS. QMOM is up 13.41% year-to-date (YTD) with +$33M in YTD flows. FCUS performs better with 14.01% YTD performance, and +$34M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QMOM and FCUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QMOM vs FCUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QMOM FCUS | -6.20%-20.10% | -3.51%-13.84% | +13.41%+14.01% | +16.06%+36.46% | +61.35%+81.04% | +61.85%n/a |
| Flows | QMOM FCUS | +$8M+$1M | +$3M+$22M | +$33M+$34M | +$24M+$33M | +$158M+$63M | +$228M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QMOM FCUS | +28.88%+52.83% | +25.47%+41.27% | +23.52%+33.83% | +24.13%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QMOM FCUS | -12.51%-31.02% | -12.61%-31.02% | -26.41%-39.84% | -26.41%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QMOM FCUS | 58d57d | 38d57d | 414d251d | 414dn/a |
Trading data
QMOM | FCUS | |
Last sale 8/3/2026 at 4:21 PM | $73.97 | $36.71 |
| Previous close 07/31/2026 | $73.74 | $36.02 |
| Consolidated volume 07/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/3/2026 at 4:21 PM
Live
Closed
QMOM | FCUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $73.97 | $36.71 |
| 1D performance | +0.31% | +1.92% |
| AuM | $424.10 M | $80.32 M |
| E/R | 0.28% | 0.8% |
Characteristics
QMOM | FCUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Alpha Architect | Pinnacle Dynamic Funds |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 30 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 2, 2015 | December 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QMOM
USA
93.82%
Other
6.18%
FCUS
USA
97.67%
Other
2.33%
Sectors
QMOM
Industrials
21.89%
Technology
21.86%
Healthcare
17.95%
Energy
16.1%
Non-Energy Materi.
16.01%
Other
6.19%
FCUS
Technology
49.13%
Energy
23.92%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.67%
Industrials
10.6%
Other
4.68%
Advertisement
Diversification
QMOM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.3%
FCUS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
62.2%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
QMOM
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.
2.06%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
2.05%
SLB Ltd.
2.02%
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2.02%
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
2.02%
ATI, Inc.
2.02%
Halliburton Co.
2.02%
BorgWarner, Inc.
2.02%
Nucor Corp.
2.01%
Five Below, Inc.
2.01%
Baker Hughes Co.
2.01%
Alcoa Corp.
2.01%
Albemarle Corp.
2.01%
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
2.01%
PBF Energy, Inc.
2.01%
FCUS
Sandisk Corp.
5.39%
Intel Corp.
5.30%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.92%
Western Digital Corp.
4.61%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
4.48%
SiTime Corp.
4.42%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.41%
Bloom Energy Corp.
4.05%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
3.94%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
3.65%
Ciena Corp.
3.56%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.47%
Valero Energy Corp.
3.46%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
3.31%
Permian Resources Corp.
3.23%
Frequently asked questions about QMOM and FCUS
How have the QMOM and FCUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, QMOM is up 13.41% year-to-date (YTD), while FCUS has returned 14.01%. That puts FCUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QMOM or FCUS?
Year-to-date, the QMOM ETF saw +$33M in flows, compared to +$34M for FCUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: QMOM or FCUS?
Over the past year, QMOM had a volatility of 25.47%, while FCUS experienced 41.27%.
Which ETF is bigger: QMOM or FCUS?
As of July 30, 2026, QMOM holds $424.10 M in assets under management (AUM), while FCUS manages $80.32 M.
What sectors do the QMOM and FCUS ETFs invest in?
QMOM leans toward sectors like Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FCUS focuses on Technology, Energy and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the QMOM ETF and FCUS ETF?
QMOM top holdings include Kodiak Gas Services, Inc., Dell Technologies, Inc. and SLB Ltd.. FCUS holds in its top three: Sandisk Corp., Intel Corp. and Micron Technology, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QMOM or FCUS?
QMOM holds 50 securities with 30.3% of its assets in the top 15. FCUS has 30 securities and a top 15 weight of 62.2%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
