QMOMvsCWSETF Comparison
VS
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) and AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QMOM's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, CWS's top sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. QMOM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.28%, versus 0.79% for CWS. QMOM is up 13.71% year-to-date (YTD) with +$33M in YTD flows. CWS performs worse with 3.82% YTD performance, and -$52M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QMOM and CWS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QMOM vs CWS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QMOM CWS | -3.03%+4.59% | -3.25%+4.75% | +13.71%+3.82% | +16.56%+3.80% | +64.60%+29.81% | +61.51%+49.90% |
| Flows | QMOM CWS | +$8M-$7M | +$3M-$29M | +$33M-$52M | +$26M-$62M | +$158M+$24M | +$228M+$62M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QMOM CWS | +29.13%+11.07% | +25.45%+13.44% | +23.54%+13.92% | +24.14%+15.83% |
| Max drawdown | QMOM CWS | -12.51%-2.43% | -12.61%-11.94% | -26.41%-16.20% | -26.41%-23.63% |
| Max drawdown duration | QMOM CWS | 62d18d | 38d193d | 414d404d | 414d532d |
Trading data
QMOM | CWS | |
Last sale 8/3/2026 at 7:59 PM | $74.25 | $71.60 |
| Previous close 08/03/2026 | $73.74 | $71.44 |
| Consolidated volume 08/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/3/2026 at 7:59 PM
Live
Closed
QMOM | CWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $74.25 | $71.60 |
| 1D performance | +0.69% | +0.23% |
| AuM | $425.23 M | $130.83 M |
| E/R | 0.28% | 0.79% |
Characteristics
QMOM | CWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Alpha Architect | AdvisorShares |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 25 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 2, 2015 | September 20, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QMOM
USA
93.82%
Other
6.18%
CWS
USA
99.79%
Other
0.21%
Sectors
QMOM
Industrials
21.89%
Technology
21.86%
Healthcare
17.95%
Energy
16.1%
Non-Energy Materi.
16.01%
Other
6.19%
CWS
Industrials
29.33%
Healthcare
25.25%
Technology
12.24%
Business Services
9.29%
Other
23.89%
Advertisement
Diversification
QMOM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.3%
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.71%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
QMOM
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.
2.06%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
2.05%
BorgWarner, Inc.
2.02%
ATI, Inc.
2.02%
SLB Ltd.
2.02%
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
2.02%
Halliburton Co.
2.02%
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2.02%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
2.01%
Albemarle Corp.
2.01%
Jazz Pharmaceuticals Plc
2.01%
Alcoa Corp.
2.01%
Argan, Inc.
2.01%
Baker Hughes Co.
2.01%
APA Corp.
2.01%
CWS
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
8.45%
IES Holdings, Inc.
7.38%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
5.65%
Amphenol Corp.
4.97%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.70%
Science Applications International Corp.
4.49%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.49%
HEICO Corp.
4.31%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.25%
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
4.20%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
4.09%
Stryker Corp.
3.79%
McKesson Corp.
3.69%
Moody's Corp.
3.68%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.57%
Frequently asked questions about QMOM and CWS
How have the QMOM and CWS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 3, 2026, QMOM is up 13.71% year-to-date (YTD), while CWS has returned 3.82%. That puts QMOM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QMOM or CWS?
Year-to-date, the QMOM ETF saw +$33M in flows, compared to -$52M for CWS.
Which ETF is more volatile: QMOM or CWS?
Over the past year, QMOM had a volatility of 25.45%, while CWS experienced 13.44%.
Which ETF is bigger: QMOM or CWS?
As of August 3, 2026, QMOM holds $425.23 M in assets under management (AUM), while CWS manages $130.83 M.
What sectors do the QMOM and CWS ETFs invest in?
QMOM leans toward sectors like Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, CWS focuses on Industrials, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the QMOM ETF and CWS ETF?
QMOM top holdings include Kodiak Gas Services, Inc., Dell Technologies, Inc. and BorgWarner, Inc.. CWS holds in its top three: Comfort Systems USA, Inc., IES Holdings, Inc. and Casey's General Stores, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QMOM or CWS?
QMOM holds 50 securities with 30.3% of its assets in the top 15. CWS has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 71.71%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
