QMOMvsARWGETF Comparison
VS
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) and Archer Growth ETF (ARWG) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QMOM's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, ARWG's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Energy. QMOM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.28%, versus 0.85% for ARWG. QMOM is up 13.41% year-to-date (YTD) with +$33M in YTD flows. ARWG performs worse with 6.06% YTD performance, and +$10M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QMOM and ARWG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QMOM vs ARWG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QMOM ARWG | -6.20%-3.21% | -3.51%+4.55% | +13.41%+6.06% | +16.06%n/a | +61.35%n/a | +61.85%n/a |
| Flows | QMOM ARWG | +$8M+$529K | +$3M+$1M | +$33M+$10M | +$24M- | +$158M- | +$228M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QMOM ARWG | +28.88%+24.20% | +25.47%n/a | +23.52%n/a | +24.13%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QMOM ARWG | -12.51%-7.30% | -12.61%n/a | -26.41%n/a | -26.41%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QMOM ARWG | 58d15d | 38dn/a | 414dn/a | 414dn/a |
Trading data
QMOM | ARWG | |
Last sale 8/3/2026 at 3:07 PM | $74.05 | $25.90 |
| Previous close 07/31/2026 | $73.74 | $25.90 |
| Consolidated volume 07/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/3/2026 at 3:07 PM
Live
Closed
QMOM | ARWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $74.05 | $25.90 |
| 1D performance | +0.42% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $424.10 M | $14.00 M |
| E/R | 0.28% | 0.85% |
Characteristics
QMOM | ARWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Alpha Architect | Archer funds |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 40 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 2, 2015 | December 30, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QMOM
USA
93.82%
Other
6.18%
ARWG
USA
97.54%
Other
2.46%
Sectors
QMOM
Industrials
21.89%
Technology
21.86%
Healthcare
17.95%
Energy
16.1%
Non-Energy Materi.
16.01%
Other
6.19%
ARWG
Technology
50.69%
Industrials
20.37%
Energy
9.68%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.64%
Other
9.62%
Advertisement
Diversification
QMOM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.3%
ARWG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.49%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
QMOM
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.
2.06%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
2.05%
SLB Ltd.
2.02%
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2.02%
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
2.02%
ATI, Inc.
2.02%
Halliburton Co.
2.02%
BorgWarner, Inc.
2.02%
Nucor Corp.
2.01%
Five Below, Inc.
2.01%
Baker Hughes Co.
2.01%
Alcoa Corp.
2.01%
Albemarle Corp.
2.01%
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
2.01%
PBF Energy, Inc.
2.01%
ARWG
RXO, Inc.
3.31%
Sandisk Corp.
3.13%
Lam Research Corp.
3.07%
MKS, Inc.
3.04%
Axon Enterprise, Inc.
2.82%
Freshworks, Inc.
2.72%
Silicon Motion Technology Corp.
2.71%
Western Digital Corp.
2.71%
Unity Software, Inc.
2.62%
Block, Inc.
2.62%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
2.58%
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
2.58%
Datadog, Inc.
2.56%
SentinelOne, Inc.
2.52%
UiPath, Inc.
2.50%
Frequently asked questions about QMOM and ARWG
How have the QMOM and ARWG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, QMOM is up 13.41% year-to-date (YTD), while ARWG has returned 6.06%. That puts QMOM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QMOM or ARWG?
Year-to-date, the QMOM ETF saw +$33M in flows, compared to +$10M for ARWG.
Which ETF is bigger: QMOM or ARWG?
As of July 30, 2026, QMOM holds $424.10 M in assets under management (AUM), while ARWG manages $14.00 M.
What sectors do the QMOM and ARWG ETFs invest in?
QMOM leans toward sectors like Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, ARWG focuses on Technology, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the QMOM ETF and ARWG ETF?
QMOM top holdings include Kodiak Gas Services, Inc., Dell Technologies, Inc. and SLB Ltd.. ARWG holds in its top three: RXO, Inc., Sandisk Corp. and Lam Research Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: QMOM or ARWG?
QMOM holds 50 securities with 30.3% of its assets in the top 15. ARWG has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.49%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
