Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QMIDvsTMFMETF Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QMID's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Information Technology. In contrast, TMFM's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials. QMID is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.85% for TMFM. QMID is down -3.23% year-to-date (YTD) with +$706K in YTD flows. TMFM performs worse with -12.03% YTD performance, and -$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QMID and TMFM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QMID vs TMFM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QMID TMFM | -4.29%-5.32% | -5.44%-13.91% | -3.23%-12.03% | +10.22%-16.40% | n/a+12.40% | n/an/a |
| Flows | QMID TMFM | +$706K-$2M | +$706K-$9M | +$706K-$7M | +$710K-$30M | --$67M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QMID TMFM | +14.44%+19.84% | +20.63%+20.90% | n/a+16.90% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QMID TMFM | -7.27%-15.12% | -13.86%-23.83% | n/a-28.36% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QMID TMFM | 49d60d | 46d246d | n/a471d | n/an/a |
QMID | TMFM | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.33 | $20.70 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $27.85 | $20.60 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QMID | TMFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QMID | TMFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.33 | $20.70 |
| 1D performance | -1.86% | +0.49% |
| AuM | $2.05 M | $120.42 M |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.85% |
QMID | TMFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | WisdomTree | Motley Fool Asset Management |
| Benchmark | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth MidCap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 120 | 29 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 25, 2024 | June 17, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QMID and TMFM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, QMID is down -3.23% year-to-date (YTD), while TMFM has lost -12.03%. That puts QMID better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QMID or TMFM?
Year-to-date, the QMID ETF saw +$706K in flows, compared to -$7M for TMFM.
Which ETF is more volatile: QMID or TMFM?
Over the past year, QMID had a volatility of 20.63%, while TMFM experienced 20.9%.
Which ETF is bigger: QMID or TMFM?
As of March 12, 2026, QMID holds $2.05 M in assets under management (AUM), while TMFM manages $120.42 M.
What sectors do the QMID and TMFM ETFs invest in?
QMID leans toward sectors like Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Information Technology. Meanwhile, TMFM focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the QMID ETF and TMFM ETF?
QMID top holdings include US65290E1010, ATI INC and COEUR MINING INC. TMFM holds in its top three: US82846H4056, STONEX GROUP INC and GXO LOGISTICS INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: QMID or TMFM?
QMID holds 125 securities with 18.78% of its assets in the top 15. TMFM has 30 securities and a top 15 weight of 63.62%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
