QMIDvsSMAPETF Comparison
VS
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QMID's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. In contrast, SMAP's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. QMID is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.6% for SMAP. QMID is up 1.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$706K in YTD flows. SMAP performs better with 5.75% YTD performance, and -$26K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QMID and SMAP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QMID vs SMAP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 05/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QMID SMAP | +4.75%+5.98% | -0.24%+2.32% | +1.05%+5.75% | +15.64%+15.49% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | QMID SMAP | -- | +$706K-$26K | +$706K-$26K | +$710K-$26K | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QMID SMAP | +17.21%+18.63% | +15.56%+16.31% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QMID SMAP | -10.22%-9.95% | -10.70%-9.95% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QMID SMAP | 64d68d | 99d68d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
QMID | SMAP | |
Last sale 5/1/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.55 | $26.09 |
| Previous close 04/29/2026 | $28.53 | $26.28 |
| Consolidated volume 04/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SMAP
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexQMID | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 5/1/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QMID | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.55 | $26.09 |
| 1D performance | +0.06% | -0.71% |
| AuM | $2.14 M | $1.31 M |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
QMID | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | WisdomTree | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth MidCap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 120 | 54 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 25, 2024 | October 23, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QMID
USA
92.76%
Other
7.24%
SMAP
USA
94.92%
Other
5.08%
Sectors
QMID
Industrials
20.87%
Consumer Discreti.
17.24%
Health Care
14.78%
Information Techn.
13.56%
Financials
12.59%
Other
20.96%
SMAP
Industrials
18.99%
Financials
14.65%
Health Care
14.16%
Information Techn.
12.84%
Consumer Discreti.
8.3%
Materials
7.57%
Other
23.49%
Advertisement
Diversification
QMID
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.07%
SMAP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
QMID
ATI INC
1.73%
ROIVANT SCIENCES LTD
1.69%
US65290E1010
1.59%
US71424F1057
1.44%
COCA COLA CONSOLIDATED
1.31%
TRADEWEB MARKETS
1.30%
RENAISSANCERE
1.26%
DECKERS OUTDOOR
1.26%
EVEREST REINSURANCE GROUP
1.24%
NEW YORK TIMES
1.24%
PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP
1.23%
LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS
1.22%
BJS WHOLESALE CLUB HOLDINGS INC
1.22%
NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES
1.17%
TOLL BROTHERS
1.17%
SMAP
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS
3.71%
CASEYS GENERAL STORES
3.32%
WEST PHARM SVCS
3.10%
STIFEL FINANCIAL
3.05%
MATADOR RESOURCES
3.01%
MKS INSTRUMENTS
2.87%
CURTISS WRIGHT
2.77%
WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION
2.74%
WATSCO
2.64%
AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP
2.63%
MARKET CORPORATION
2.54%
RANGE RESOURCES
2.54%
EAGLE MATERIALS
2.38%
BJS WHOLESALE CLUB HOLDINGS INC
2.28%
APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES
2.26%
Frequently asked questions about QMID and SMAP
How have the QMID and SMAP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of May 1, 2026, QMID is up 1.05% year-to-date (YTD), while SMAP has returned 5.75%. That puts SMAP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QMID or SMAP?
Year-to-date, the QMID ETF saw +$706K in flows, compared to -$26K for SMAP.
Which ETF is more volatile: QMID or SMAP?
Over the past year, QMID had a volatility of 15.56%, while SMAP experienced 16.31%.
Which ETF is bigger: QMID or SMAP?
As of May 1, 2026, QMID holds $2.14 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMAP manages $1.31 M.
What sectors do the QMID and SMAP ETFs invest in?
QMID leans toward sectors like Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. Meanwhile, SMAP focuses on Industrials, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the QMID ETF and SMAP ETF?
QMID top holdings include ATI INC, ROIVANT SCIENCES LTD and US65290E1010. SMAP holds in its top three: MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, CASEYS GENERAL STORES and WEST PHARM SVCS.
Which ETF is more diversified: QMID or SMAP?
QMID holds 125 securities with 20.07% of its assets in the top 15. SMAP has 56 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.84%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
