QMIDvsGRPMETF Comparison
VS
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QMID's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, GRPM's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. QMID is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.35% for GRPM. QMID is up 5.79% year-to-date (YTD) with +$700K in YTD flows. GRPM performs better with 13.99% YTD performance, and -$75M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QMID and GRPM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QMID vs GRPM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QMID GRPM | +1.67%+4.39% | +4.75%+8.36% | +5.79%+13.99% | +7.44%+18.40% | n/a+47.12% | n/a+56.40% |
| Flows | QMID GRPM | --$13M | -$6K-$39M | +$700K-$75M | +$704K-$60M | -+$134M | -+$228M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QMID GRPM | +13.45%+13.61% | +15.14%+15.77% | n/a+19.92% | n/a+20.77% |
| Max drawdown | QMID GRPM | -4.15%-2.85% | -10.70%-7.71% | n/a-27.87% | n/a-27.87% |
| Max drawdown duration | QMID GRPM | 22d23d | 160d66d | n/a421d | n/a421d |
Trading data
QMID | GRPM | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.78 | $135.35 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $29.90 | $135.82 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QMID | GRPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QMID | GRPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.78 | $135.35 |
| 1D performance | -0.40% | -0.35% |
| AuM | $2.24 M | $482.28 M |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
QMID | GRPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | WisdomTree | Invesco |
| Benchmark | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth MidCap Index | S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index |
| N° of holdings | 124 | 60 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 25, 2024 | December 3, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QMID
USA
94.4%
Other
5.6%
GRPM
USA
93.29%
Other
6.71%
Sectors
QMID
Industrials
17.76%
Healthcare
16.64%
Technology
16.63%
Finance
13.53%
Consumer Services
11.7%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.19%
Other
16.56%
GRPM
Finance
25.67%
Healthcare
19.16%
Technology
16.84%
Industrials
7.14%
Other
31.19%
Advertisement
Diversification
QMID
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.85%
GRPM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.09%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
QMID
Somnigroup International, Inc.
1.43%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
1.39%
TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
1.33%
Ralph Lauren Corp.
1.32%
Dycom Industries, Inc.
1.32%
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
1.28%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
1.26%
Deckers Outdoor Corp.
1.26%
Everest Group Ltd.
1.22%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.21%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
1.20%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
1.17%
DaVita, Inc.
1.17%
Permian Resources Corp.
1.16%
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
1.13%
GRPM
Duolingo, Inc.
2.57%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
2.51%
InterDigital, Inc.
2.49%
Hecla Mining Co.
2.46%
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
2.39%
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
2.32%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
2.32%
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
2.29%
Globus Medical, Inc.
2.23%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
2.17%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
2.17%
TechnipFMC plc
2.07%
Exelixis, Inc.
2.06%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
2.03%
SLM Corp.
2.01%
Frequently asked questions about QMID and GRPM
How have the QMID and GRPM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, QMID is up 5.79% year-to-date (YTD), while GRPM has returned 13.99%. That puts GRPM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QMID or GRPM?
Year-to-date, the QMID ETF saw +$700K in flows, compared to -$75M for GRPM.
Which ETF is more volatile: QMID or GRPM?
Over the past year, QMID had a volatility of 15.14%, while GRPM experienced 15.77%.
Which ETF is bigger: QMID or GRPM?
As of July 30, 2026, QMID holds $2.24 M in assets under management (AUM), while GRPM manages $482.28 M.
What sectors do the QMID and GRPM ETFs invest in?
QMID leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, GRPM focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the QMID ETF and GRPM ETF?
QMID top holdings include Somnigroup International, Inc., Tenet Healthcare Corp. and TKO Group Holdings, Inc.. GRPM holds in its top three: Duolingo, Inc., RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. and InterDigital, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QMID or GRPM?
QMID holds 124 securities with 18.85% of its assets in the top 15. GRPM has 60 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.09%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
