QMIDvsGRPMETF Comparison
VS
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QMID's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, GRPM's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. QMID is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.35% for GRPM. QMID is up 4.26% year-to-date (YTD) with +$700K in YTD flows. GRPM performs better with 17.4% YTD performance, and -$63M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QMID and GRPM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QMID vs GRPM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QMID GRPM | -4.02%-1.70% | +1.42%+8.68% | +4.26%+17.40% | +4.06%+17.31% | n/a+62.57% | n/a+61.50% |
| Flows | QMID GRPM | -+$11M | --$3M | +$700K-$63M | +$704K-$12M | -+$131M | -+$241M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QMID GRPM | +13.85%+14.15% | +14.95%+15.50% | n/a+19.91% | n/a+20.78% |
| Max drawdown | QMID GRPM | -5.71%-4.19% | -10.70%-7.71% | n/a-27.87% | n/a-27.87% |
| Max drawdown duration | QMID GRPM | 22d20d | 160d66d | n/a421d | n/a421d |
Trading data
QMID | GRPM | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.38 | $139.46 |
| Previous close 09/16/2026 | $29.40 | $139.92 |
| Consolidated volume 09/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QMID | GRPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QMID | GRPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.38 | $139.46 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | -0.33% |
| AuM | $2.21 M | $507.90 M |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
QMID | GRPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | WisdomTree | Invesco |
| Benchmark | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth MidCap Index | S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index |
| N° of holdings | 124 | 60 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 25, 2024 | December 3, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QMID
USA
94.26%
Other
5.74%
GRPM
USA
93.81%
Other
6.19%
Sectors
QMID
Technology
18.26%
Healthcare
17.86%
Industrials
15.12%
Finance
13.85%
Consumer Services
11.51%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.24%
Other
16.15%
GRPM
Finance
26.16%
Healthcare
19.12%
Technology
17.52%
Other
37.2%
Advertisement
Diversification
QMID
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.13%
GRPM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.2%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
QMID
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
1.85%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
1.38%
Toast, Inc.
1.36%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
1.29%
Everest Group Ltd.
1.29%
DaVita, Inc.
1.27%
Permian Resources Corp.
1.25%
Atlassian Corp.
1.21%
Ralph Lauren Corp.
1.21%
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
1.19%
Deckers Outdoor Corp.
1.19%
Somnigroup International, Inc.
1.18%
Nutanix, Inc.
1.16%
lululemon athletica, Inc.
1.16%
TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
1.16%
GRPM
Duolingo, Inc.
2.80%
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
2.52%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
2.47%
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
2.43%
Paylocity Holding Corp.
2.30%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
2.28%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
2.28%
AppFolio, Inc.
2.25%
InterDigital, Inc.
2.22%
TechnipFMC plc
2.18%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
2.16%
Hecla Mining Co.
2.12%
SharkNinja, Inc.
2.09%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
2.06%
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
2.05%
Frequently asked questions about QMID and GRPM
How have the QMID and GRPM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, QMID is up 4.26% year-to-date (YTD), while GRPM has returned 17.4%. That puts GRPM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QMID or GRPM?
Year-to-date, the QMID ETF saw +$700K in flows, compared to -$63M for GRPM.
Which ETF is more volatile: QMID or GRPM?
Over the past year, QMID had a volatility of 14.95%, while GRPM experienced 15.5%.
Which ETF is bigger: QMID or GRPM?
As of September 15, 2026, QMID holds $2.21 M in assets under management (AUM), while GRPM manages $507.90 M.
What sectors do the QMID and GRPM ETFs invest in?
QMID leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, GRPM focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the QMID ETF and GRPM ETF?
QMID top holdings include Tenet Healthcare Corp., Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Toast, Inc.. GRPM holds in its top three: Duolingo, Inc., Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. and RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: QMID or GRPM?
QMID holds 124 securities with 19.13% of its assets in the top 15. GRPM has 60 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.2%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
