New

Create, analyze, optimize your ETF portfolio. Start now →

Advertisement
Advertisement

QLVEvsGEMETF Comparison

ETF 1
QLVE

Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF

This fund is part of
EM Large & Mid Cap
-1.26%
VS
ETF 2
GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

This fund is part of
EM Large & Mid Cap
-1.26%

Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF (QLVE) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. QLVE's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, GEM's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. QLVE is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.59% for GEM. QLVE is up 13.46% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. GEM performs better with 17.1% YTD performance, and +$283M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLVE and GEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

QLVE vs GEM performance and flow charts

Performance

-4.0-2.00.02.04.0%Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14

Cumulative Flows

Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
QLVE
GEM
-1.77%-3.80%
+0.49%-1.98%
+13.46%+17.10%
+14.74%+19.90%
+62.52%+78.84%
+43.66%+44.01%
Flows
QLVE
GEM
--
-+$46M
-+$283M
-+$314M
-$3M+$196M
-$2M+$65M
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
QLVE
GEM
+17.18%+22.13%
+17.33%+23.21%
+13.11%+17.52%
+12.33%+16.74%
Max drawdown
QLVE
GEM
-5.34%-7.90%
-11.30%-13.50%
-11.89%-14.73%
-22.41%-31.24%
Max drawdown duration
QLVE
GEM
37d37d
64d57d
226d223d
903d1301d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
QLVE
GEM
Last sale
10/16/2026 at 7:59 PM
$32.56
$48.55
Previous close
10/16/2026
$32.92
$48.02
Consolidated volume
10/16/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
QLVE
GEM
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 7:59 PM
Live
Closed
QLVE
GEM
Last price
$32.56
$48.55
1D performance
-1.10%
+1.10%
AuM$16.48 M$1.68 B
E/R0.19%0.59%
Characteristics
QLVE
GEM
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderNorthern TrustGoldman Sachs
BenchmarkNorthern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility IndexGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index
N° of holdings132718
Asset classEquitiesEquities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateJuly 16, 2019September 25, 2015
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

QLVE
Taiwan
24.83%
Republic of Korea
17.52%
India
15.58%
China
11.63%
Other
30.43%
GEM
Taiwan
24.08%
Republic of Korea
18.43%
China
17.83%
India
9.88%
Other
29.78%

Sectors

QLVE
Technology
37.63%
Finance
14.52%
Industrials
8.02%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.86%
Energy
7.06%
Other
24.91%
GEM
Technology
40.28%
Finance
19.88%
Other
39.85%
Advertisement

Diversification

QLVE

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

41.85%
GEM

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

35.34%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of August 31, 2026
QLVE
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
14.89%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
6.36%
International Holding Co. PJSC
3.43%
SK hynix, Inc.
2.97%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.33%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.98%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
1.23%
Samsung SDS Co., Ltd.
1.23%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
1.14%
United Microelectronics Corp.
1.11%
Infosys Ltd.
1.10%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.06%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
1.03%
MediaTek, Inc.
0.99%
Novatek Microelectronics Corp.
0.99%
GEM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
13.94%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
6.54%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.36%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.59%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
1.68%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.32%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
0.84%
China Construction Bank Corp.
0.74%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
0.67%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.47%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
0.47%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
0.47%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
0.46%
King Slide Works Co., Ltd.
0.39%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
0.39%
Frequently asked questions about QLVE and GEM

How have the QLVE and GEM ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 16, 2026, QLVE is up 13.46% year-to-date (YTD), while GEM has returned 17.1%. That puts GEM better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLVE or GEM?

Year-to-date, the QLVE ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$283M for GEM.

Which ETF is more volatile: QLVE or GEM?

Over the past year, QLVE had a volatility of 17.33%, while GEM experienced 23.21%.

Which ETF is bigger: QLVE or GEM?

As of October 16, 2026, QLVE holds $16.48 M in assets under management (AUM), while GEM manages $1.68 B.

What sectors do the QLVE and GEM ETFs invest in?

QLVE leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, GEM focuses on Technology and Finance.

What are the top holdings of the QLVE ETF and GEM ETF?

QLVE top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and International Holding Co. PJSC. GEM holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..

Which ETF is more diversified: QLVE or GEM?

QLVE holds 133 securities with 41.85% of its assets in the top 15. GEM has 740 securities and a top 15 weight of 35.34%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
New Report

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection

With 1,790 new products launched by July 2026, choosing is harder than ever. Our Global ETF Survey 2026, built on 620 professional investors and allocators, shows how active, fixed income, options-based and thematic ETFs are reshaping fund selection.

Global ETF Survey 2026