QLVDvsTPIFETF Comparison
ETF 1
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.25%
VS
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF (QLVD) and Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. QLVD's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials. In contrast, TPIF's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. QLVD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.62% for TPIF. QLVD is up 9.03% year-to-date (YTD) with -$8M in YTD flows. TPIF performs worse with 8.92% YTD performance, and +$39M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLVD and TPIF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QLVD vs TPIF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLVD TPIF | +4.33%+0.70% | +4.74%+1.01% | +9.03%+8.92% | +14.30%+18.52% | +44.40%+56.01% | +41.72%+43.83% |
| Flows | QLVD TPIF | -+$7M | +$31K+$8M | -$8M+$39M | -$9M+$75M | -$32M+$103M | -$38M+$118M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLVD TPIF | +9.15%+11.51% | +9.25%+11.61% | +10.29%+12.58% | +11.14%+14.09% |
| Max drawdown | QLVD TPIF | -2.24%-3.46% | -7.96%-9.63% | -9.60%-12.16% | -24.25%-32.20% |
| Max drawdown duration | QLVD TPIF | 56d15d | 149d149d | 157d135d | 980d1081d |
Trading data
QLVD | TPIF | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.19 | $37.30 |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $34.11 | $37.47 |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QLVD | TPIF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QLVD | TPIF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.19 | $37.30 |
| 1D performance | +0.25% | -0.45% |
| AuM | $54.60 M | $249.31 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.62% |
Characteristics
QLVD | TPIF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | FlexShares | Timothy Plan |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index | Victory International Volatility Weighted BRI Index |
| N° of holdings | 173 | 368 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 16, 2019 | December 2, 2019 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QLVD
Japan
19.27%
Canada
15.59%
Switzerland
11.1%
United Kingdom
8.57%
France
7.45%
Other
38.03%
TPIF
Japan
19.72%
Canada
11.79%
Switzerland
8.46%
Other
60.04%
Sectors
QLVD
Finance
28.18%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
12.65%
Industrials
11.32%
Healthcare
9.76%
Utilities
7.2%
Other
30.88%
TPIF
Finance
28.28%
Industrials
19.37%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.42%
Utilities
8.29%
Technology
7.79%
Other
26.85%
Advertisement
Diversification
QLVD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.71%
TPIF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.51%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
QLVD
Novartis AG
3.85%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.99%
ASML Holding NV
2.58%
Unilever Plc
2.21%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
1.75%
Air Liquide SA
1.73%
Nestlé SA
1.72%
Iberdrola SA
1.65%
Sanofi
1.59%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.47%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.42%
Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG
1.23%
Shell Plc
1.22%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.15%
Deutsche Telekom AG
1.13%
TPIF
CLP Holdings Ltd.
0.71%
Great-West Lifeco, Inc.
0.64%
Fortis, Inc.
0.62%
Hydro One Ltd.
0.60%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
0.58%
Emera, Inc.
0.58%
United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore)
0.56%
Power Corp of Canada
0.54%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
0.54%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
0.54%
Poste Italiane SpA
0.53%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
0.53%
National Bank of Canada
0.53%
Singapore Airlines Ltd.
0.51%
Telstra Group Ltd.
0.51%
Frequently asked questions about QLVD and TPIF
How have the QLVD and TPIF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, QLVD is up 9.03% year-to-date (YTD), while TPIF has returned 8.92%. That puts QLVD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLVD or TPIF?
Year-to-date, the QLVD ETF saw -$8M in flows, compared to +$39M for TPIF.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLVD or TPIF?
Over the past year, QLVD had a volatility of 9.25%, while TPIF experienced 11.61%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLVD or TPIF?
As of July 28, 2026, QLVD holds $54.60 M in assets under management (AUM), while TPIF manages $249.31 M.
What sectors do the QLVD and TPIF ETFs invest in?
QLVD leans toward sectors like Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials. Meanwhile, TPIF focuses on Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the QLVD ETF and TPIF ETF?
QLVD top holdings include Novartis AG, Royal Bank of Canada and ASML Holding NV. TPIF holds in its top three: CLP Holdings Ltd., Great-West Lifeco, Inc. and Fortis, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QLVD or TPIF?
QLVD holds 174 securities with 27.71% of its assets in the top 15. TPIF has 368 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.51%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
