QLVDvsTPIFETF Comparison
ETF 1
QLVD
Northern Trust Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.45%
VS
Northern Trust Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility ETF (QLVD) and Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. QLVD's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials. In contrast, TPIF's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. QLVD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.62% for TPIF. QLVD is up 9% year-to-date (YTD) with -$10M in YTD flows. TPIF performs better with 11.8% YTD performance, and +$57M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLVD and TPIF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QLVD vs TPIF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLVD TPIF | -1.54%-0.85% | +4.93%+4.10% | +9.00%+11.80% | +11.23%+17.34% | +48.48%+68.26% | +37.68%+44.64% |
| Flows | QLVD TPIF | -$2M+$12M | -$2M+$25M | -$10M+$57M | -$13M+$86M | -$34M+$120M | -$40M+$139M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLVD TPIF | +7.93%+10.06% | +9.11%+11.48% | +10.17%+12.46% | +11.11%+14.06% |
| Max drawdown | QLVD TPIF | -2.48%-2.83% | -7.96%-9.63% | -9.60%-11.87% | -23.99%-31.83% |
| Max drawdown duration | QLVD TPIF | 17d44d | 150d155d | 157d35d | 968d1071d |
Trading data
QLVD | TPIF | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.07 | $38.37 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $33.95 | $38.00 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QLVD | TPIF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QLVD | TPIF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.07 | $38.37 |
| 1D performance | +0.37% | +0.97% |
| AuM | $52.87 M | $272.56 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.62% |
Characteristics
QLVD | TPIF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Northern Trust | Timothy Plan |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index | Victory International Volatility Weighted BRI Index |
| N° of holdings | 172 | 366 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 16, 2019 | December 2, 2019 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QLVD
Japan
20.3%
Canada
15.24%
Switzerland
10.55%
United Kingdom
8.65%
France
7.17%
Other
38.09%
TPIF
Japan
19.79%
Canada
11.94%
Switzerland
8.33%
Other
59.95%
Sectors
QLVD
Finance
28.69%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
12.46%
Industrials
11.26%
Healthcare
9.37%
Other
38.21%
TPIF
Finance
29.24%
Industrials
19.07%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.3%
Utilities
8.25%
Energy
7%
Other
27.14%
Advertisement
Diversification
QLVD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.17%
TPIF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.61%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
QLVD
Novartis AG
3.69%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.92%
Unilever Plc
2.22%
ASML Holding NV
2.21%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
1.74%
Air Liquide SA
1.65%
Nestlé SA
1.57%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.55%
Iberdrola SA
1.53%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.53%
Sanofi
1.51%
Shell Plc
1.38%
Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG
1.28%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
1.22%
Deutsche Telekom AG
1.17%
TPIF
CLP Holdings Ltd.
0.74%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
0.67%
Great-West Lifeco, Inc.
0.65%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
0.61%
United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore)
0.60%
Fortis, Inc.
0.60%
Hydro One Ltd.
0.59%
Power Corp of Canada
0.58%
Emera, Inc.
0.57%
National Bank of Canada
0.53%
TC Energy Corp.
0.50%
Singapore Airlines Ltd.
0.50%
Telstra Group Ltd.
0.50%
Assicurazioni Generali SpA
0.48%
Poste Italiane SpA
0.48%
Frequently asked questions about QLVD and TPIF
How have the QLVD and TPIF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, QLVD is up 9% year-to-date (YTD), while TPIF has returned 11.8%. That puts TPIF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLVD or TPIF?
Year-to-date, the QLVD ETF saw -$10M in flows, compared to +$57M for TPIF.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLVD or TPIF?
Over the past year, QLVD had a volatility of 9.11%, while TPIF experienced 11.48%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLVD or TPIF?
As of September 11, 2026, QLVD holds $52.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while TPIF manages $272.56 M.
What sectors do the QLVD and TPIF ETFs invest in?
QLVD leans toward sectors like Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials. Meanwhile, TPIF focuses on Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the QLVD ETF and TPIF ETF?
QLVD top holdings include Novartis AG, Royal Bank of Canada and Unilever Plc. TPIF holds in its top three: CLP Holdings Ltd., Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd. and Great-West Lifeco, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QLVD or TPIF?
QLVD holds 173 securities with 27.17% of its assets in the top 15. TPIF has 366 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.61%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
