Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QLVDvsQEFAETF Comparison
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF (QLVD) and SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Health Care. QLVD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.14%, versus 0.3% for QEFA. QLVD is up 3.74% year-to-date (YTD) with +$66K in YTD flows. QEFA performs better with 4.26% YTD performance, and +$23M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLVD and QEFA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QLVD vs QEFA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLVD QEFA | -2.28%-3.51% | +6.31%+6.63% | +3.74%+4.26% | +17.27%+21.87% | +47.13%+54.59% | +46.99%+54.14% |
| Flows | QLVD QEFA | +$66K- | +$66K+$23M | +$66K+$23M | +$10M-$2M | -$32M-$212M | -$36M+$215M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLVD QEFA | +9.31%+12.22% | +11.72%+14.35% | +10.06%+12.36% | +11.03%+13.41% |
| Max drawdown | QLVD QEFA | -5.36%-7.00% | -8.72%-12.30% | -9.60%-12.30% | -24.25%-27.87% |
| Max drawdown duration | QLVD QEFA | 8d9d | 12d38d | 157d38d | 980d892d |
QLVD | QEFA | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.13 | $94.24 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $33.31 | $94.46 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QLVD | QEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QLVD | QEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.13 | $94.24 |
| 1D performance | -0.53% | -0.23% |
| AuM | $61.11 M | $1.04 B |
| E/R | 0.14% | 0.3% |
QLVD | QEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | FlexShares | SPDR |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index | MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series Index |
| N° of holdings | 159 | 616 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 16, 2019 | June 4, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QLVD and QEFA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, QLVD is up 3.74% year-to-date (YTD), while QEFA has returned 4.26%. That puts QEFA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLVD or QEFA?
Year-to-date, the QLVD ETF saw +$66K in flows, compared to +$23M for QEFA.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLVD or QEFA?
Over the past year, QLVD had a volatility of 11.72%, while QEFA experienced 14.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLVD or QEFA?
As of March 9, 2026, QLVD holds $61.11 M in assets under management (AUM), while QEFA manages $1.04 B.
What sectors do the QLVD and QEFA ETFs invest in?
QLVD leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, QEFA focuses on Financials, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the QLVD ETF and QEFA ETF?
QLVD top holdings include NOVARTIS, GB00BVZK7T90 and ROYAL BK CANADA. QEFA holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, NOVARTIS and ROCHE.
Which ETF is more diversified: QLVD or QEFA?
QLVD holds 167 securities with 25.56% of its assets in the top 15. QEFA has 651 securities and a top 15 weight of 20.2%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
