Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QLVDvsLCTDETF Comparison
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF (QLVD) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) is part of the segment. QLVD's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, LCTD's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. QLVD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.14%, versus 0.37% for LCTD. QLVD is up 4.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$66K in YTD flows. LCTD performs worse with 0.45% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLVD and LCTD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QLVD vs LCTD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLVD LCTD | -2.64%-6.68% | +5.46%+1.25% | +4.05%+0.45% | +18.81%+23.28% | +48.60%+53.24% | +45.26%n/a |
| Flows | QLVD LCTD | +$66K- | +$66K- | +$66K- | +$10M-$27M | -$32M-$319M | -$36M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLVD LCTD | +9.52%+15.30% | +11.71%+16.01% | +10.07%+14.05% | +11.03%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QLVD LCTD | -5.36%-8.58% | -8.72%-12.79% | -9.60%-13.33% | -24.25%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QLVD LCTD | 10d12d | 12d37d | 157d217d | 980dn/a |
QLVD | LCTD | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.66 | $54.90 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $32.81 | $55.62 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QLVD | LCTD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QLVD | LCTD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.66 | $54.90 |
| 1D performance | -0.44% | -1.29% |
| AuM | $61.29 M | $226.80 M |
| E/R | 0.14% | 0.37% |
QLVD | LCTD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | FlexShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 159 | 315 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 16, 2019 | April 8, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QLVD and LCTD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QLVD is up 4.05% year-to-date (YTD), while LCTD has returned 0.45%. That puts QLVD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLVD or LCTD?
Year-to-date, the QLVD ETF saw +$66K in flows, compared to - for LCTD.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLVD or LCTD?
Over the past year, QLVD had a volatility of 11.71%, while LCTD experienced 16.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLVD or LCTD?
As of March 11, 2026, QLVD holds $61.29 M in assets under management (AUM), while LCTD manages $226.80 M.
What sectors do the QLVD and LCTD ETFs invest in?
QLVD leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, LCTD focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the QLVD ETF and LCTD ETF?
QLVD top holdings include NOVARTIS, GB00BVZK7T90 and ROYAL BK CANADA. LCTD holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, HSBC HOLDINGS and ASTRAZENECA.
Which ETF is more diversified: QLVD or LCTD?
QLVD holds 167 securities with 25.56% of its assets in the top 15. LCTD has 331 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.16%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
