Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QLVDvsGSIEETF Comparison
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF (QLVD) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. QLVD's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, GSIE's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. QLVD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.14%, versus 0.25% for GSIE. QLVD is up 4.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$66K in YTD flows. GSIE performs worse with 2.19% YTD performance, and +$216M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLVD and GSIE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QLVD vs GSIE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLVD GSIE | -2.64%-4.88% | +5.46%+3.54% | +4.05%+2.19% | +18.81%+25.73% | +48.60%+60.66% | +45.26%+53.41% |
| Flows | QLVD GSIE | +$66K+$41M | +$66K+$216M | +$66K+$216M | +$10M+$625M | -$32M+$711M | -$36M+$1.79B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLVD GSIE | +9.52%+13.10% | +11.71%+14.72% | +10.07%+12.87% | +11.03%+14.16% |
| Max drawdown | QLVD GSIE | -5.36%-7.37% | -8.72%-13.08% | -9.60%-13.08% | -24.25%-29.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | QLVD GSIE | 10d10d | 12d37d | 157d37d | 980d911d |
QLVD | GSIE | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.81 | $42.86 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $33.13 | $43.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QLVD | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QLVD | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.81 | $42.86 |
| 1D performance | -0.97% | -1.06% |
| AuM | $61.29 M | $5.20 B |
| E/R | 0.14% | 0.25% |
QLVD | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | FlexShares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 159 | 598 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 16, 2019 | November 6, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QLVD and GSIE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QLVD is up 4.05% year-to-date (YTD), while GSIE has returned 2.19%. That puts QLVD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLVD or GSIE?
Year-to-date, the QLVD ETF saw +$66K in flows, compared to +$216M for GSIE.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLVD or GSIE?
Over the past year, QLVD had a volatility of 11.71%, while GSIE experienced 14.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLVD or GSIE?
As of March 11, 2026, QLVD holds $61.29 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSIE manages $5.20 B.
What sectors do the QLVD and GSIE ETFs invest in?
QLVD leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, GSIE focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QLVD ETF and GSIE ETF?
QLVD top holdings include NOVARTIS, GB00BVZK7T90 and ROYAL BK CANADA. GSIE holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and NOVARTIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: QLVD or GSIE?
QLVD holds 167 securities with 25.56% of its assets in the top 15. GSIE has 629 securities and a top 15 weight of 12.67%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
