QLVDvsFEDMETF Comparison
ETF 1
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.3%
VS
ETF 2
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.3%
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF (QLVD) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. QLVD's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials. In contrast, FEDM's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. QLVD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.16% for FEDM. QLVD is up 9.42% year-to-date (YTD) with -$8M in YTD flows. FEDM performs worse with 8.63% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLVD and FEDM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QLVD vs FEDM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLVD FEDM | +4.70%+2.46% | +5.98%+5.33% | +9.42%+8.63% | +15.15%+18.26% | +44.63%+47.56% | +41.20%n/a |
| Flows | QLVD FEDM | -- | +$31K-$3M | -$8M-$2M | -$9M+$10M | -$32M+$19M | -$38M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLVD FEDM | +8.98%+11.90% | +9.24%+13.17% | +10.29%+13.55% | +11.14%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QLVD FEDM | -2.24%-2.47% | -7.96%-10.69% | -9.60%-14.86% | -24.25%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QLVD FEDM | 56d16d | 150d107d | 157d214d | 980dn/a |
Trading data
QLVD | FEDM | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 7:51 PM | $34.19 | $63.46 |
| Previous close 07/29/2026 | $34.11 | $63.57 |
| Consolidated volume 07/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QLVD | FEDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 7:51 PM
Live
Closed
QLVD | FEDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.19 | $63.46 |
| 1D performance | +0.25% | -0.17% |
| AuM | $54.79 M | $77.74 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.16% |
Characteristics
QLVD | FEDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | FlexShares | FlexShares |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index | Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index |
| N° of holdings | 173 | 218 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 16, 2019 | September 21, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QLVD
Japan
19.27%
Canada
15.59%
Switzerland
11.1%
United Kingdom
8.57%
France
7.45%
Other
38.03%
FEDM
Japan
20.35%
United Kingdom
13.23%
Canada
11.16%
France
8.6%
Germany
7.63%
Other
39.03%
Sectors
QLVD
Finance
28.18%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
12.65%
Industrials
11.32%
Healthcare
9.76%
Utilities
7.2%
Other
30.88%
FEDM
Finance
29.13%
Technology
13.09%
Industrials
12.89%
Healthcare
9.47%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.04%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.61%
Other
18.77%
Advertisement
Diversification
QLVD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.71%
FEDM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.97%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
QLVD
Novartis AG
3.85%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.99%
ASML Holding NV
2.58%
Unilever Plc
2.21%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
1.75%
Air Liquide SA
1.73%
Nestlé SA
1.72%
Iberdrola SA
1.65%
Sanofi
1.59%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.47%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.42%
Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG
1.23%
Shell Plc
1.22%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.15%
Deutsche Telekom AG
1.13%
FEDM
ASML Holding NV
3.38%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.00%
Siemens AG
1.59%
Novartis AG
1.58%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.54%
Schneider Electric SE
1.46%
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA
1.39%
Shell Plc
1.36%
Advantest Corp.
1.34%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
1.30%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.23%
Enbridge, Inc.
1.21%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.20%
Zurich Insurance Group AG
1.19%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
1.18%
Frequently asked questions about QLVD and FEDM
How have the QLVD and FEDM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 29, 2026, QLVD is up 9.42% year-to-date (YTD), while FEDM has returned 8.63%. That puts QLVD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLVD or FEDM?
Year-to-date, the QLVD ETF saw -$8M in flows, compared to -$2M for FEDM.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLVD or FEDM?
Over the past year, QLVD had a volatility of 9.24%, while FEDM experienced 13.17%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLVD or FEDM?
As of July 29, 2026, QLVD holds $54.79 M in assets under management (AUM), while FEDM manages $77.74 M.
What sectors do the QLVD and FEDM ETFs invest in?
QLVD leans toward sectors like Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials. Meanwhile, FEDM focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the QLVD ETF and FEDM ETF?
QLVD top holdings include Novartis AG, Royal Bank of Canada and ASML Holding NV. FEDM holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, Royal Bank of Canada and Siemens AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: QLVD or FEDM?
QLVD holds 174 securities with 27.71% of its assets in the top 15. FEDM has 218 securities and a top 15 weight of 22.97%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
