Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QLVDvsFEDMETF Comparison
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF (QLVD) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Both QLVD and FEDM have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.14%. QLVD is up 3.74% year-to-date (YTD) with +$66K in YTD flows. FEDM performs worse with -0.66% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLVD and FEDM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QLVD vs FEDM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLVD FEDM | -2.28%-6.11% | +6.31%+1.89% | +3.74%-0.66% | +17.27%+17.94% | +47.13%+44.79% | +46.99%n/a |
| Flows | QLVD FEDM | +$66K- | +$66K+$2M | +$66K+$2M | +$10M+$16M | -$32M+$25M | -$36M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLVD FEDM | +9.31%+13.03% | +11.72%+14.91% | +10.06%+13.13% | +11.03%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QLVD FEDM | -5.36%-7.61% | -8.72%-12.85% | -9.60%-14.86% | -24.25%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QLVD FEDM | 8d8d | 12d38d | 157d214d | 980dn/a |
QLVD | FEDM | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.13 | $59.88 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $33.31 | $60.18 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QLVD | FEDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QLVD | FEDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.13 | $59.88 |
| 1D performance | -0.53% | -0.49% |
| AuM | $61.11 M | $75.26 M |
| E/R | 0.14% | 0.14% |
QLVD | FEDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | FlexShares | FlexShares |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index | Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index |
| N° of holdings | 159 | 211 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 16, 2019 | September 21, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QLVD and FEDM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, QLVD is up 3.74% year-to-date (YTD), while FEDM has lost -0.66%. That puts QLVD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLVD or FEDM?
Year-to-date, the QLVD ETF saw +$66K in flows, compared to +$2M for FEDM.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLVD or FEDM?
Over the past year, QLVD had a volatility of 11.72%, while FEDM experienced 14.91%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLVD or FEDM?
As of March 9, 2026, QLVD holds $61.11 M in assets under management (AUM), while FEDM manages $75.26 M.
What sectors do the QLVD and FEDM ETFs invest in?
QLVD leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, FEDM focuses on Financials, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the QLVD ETF and FEDM ETF?
QLVD top holdings include NOVARTIS, GB00BVZK7T90 and ROYAL BK CANADA. FEDM holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROYAL BK CANADA and SIEMENS.
Which ETF is more diversified: QLVD or FEDM?
QLVD holds 167 securities with 25.56% of its assets in the top 15. FEDM has 220 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.78%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
