QLVDvsEFAVETF Comparison
ETF 1
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.39%
VS
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF (QLVD) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. QLVD's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials. In contrast, EFAV's top sector exposures are Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. QLVD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.2% for EFAV. QLVD is up 8.22% year-to-date (YTD) with -$8M in YTD flows. EFAV performs worse with 7.82% YTD performance, and -$174M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLVD and EFAV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QLVD vs EFAV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLVD EFAV | +3.55%+3.64% | +3.81%+2.75% | +8.22%+7.82% | +13.45%+13.71% | +43.55%+46.04% | +40.51%+37.60% |
| Flows | QLVD EFAV | -+$2M | +$31K-$89M | -$8M-$174M | -$9M-$512M | -$32M-$3.97B | -$38M-$4.32B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLVD EFAV | +9.06%+9.81% | +9.24%+9.66% | +10.28%+10.26% | +11.14%+11.36% |
| Max drawdown | QLVD EFAV | -2.24%-3.82% | -7.96%-6.83% | -9.60%-8.91% | -24.25%-27.61% |
| Max drawdown duration | QLVD EFAV | 56d56d | 148d148d | 157d155d | 980d1058d |
Trading data
QLVD | EFAV | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.11 | $92.52 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $33.75 | $91.54 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QLVD | EFAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QLVD | EFAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.11 | $92.52 |
| 1D performance | +1.06% | +1.07% |
| AuM | $54.19 M | $5.30 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
QLVD | EFAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | FlexShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index | MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index |
| N° of holdings | 173 | 251 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 16, 2019 | October 18, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QLVD
Japan
19.27%
Canada
15.59%
Switzerland
11.1%
United Kingdom
8.57%
France
7.45%
Other
38.03%
EFAV
Japan
25.91%
Switzerland
10.96%
United Kingdom
10.13%
Other
53.01%
Sectors
QLVD
Finance
28.18%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
12.65%
Industrials
11.32%
Healthcare
9.76%
Utilities
7.2%
Other
30.88%
EFAV
Finance
23.22%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
13.84%
Healthcare
11.96%
Industrials
10.81%
Utilities
8.4%
Telecommunication.
8.37%
Other
23.4%
Advertisement
Diversification
QLVD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.71%
EFAV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.13%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
QLVD
Novartis AG
3.85%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.99%
ASML Holding NV
2.58%
Unilever Plc
2.21%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
1.75%
Air Liquide SA
1.73%
Nestlé SA
1.72%
Iberdrola SA
1.65%
Sanofi
1.59%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.47%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.42%
Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG
1.23%
Shell Plc
1.22%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.15%
Deutsche Telekom AG
1.13%
EFAV
Iberdrola SA
1.66%
SECOM Co., Ltd.
1.52%
Novartis AG
1.50%
Zurich Insurance Group AG
1.41%
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
1.38%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.37%
Shell Plc
1.36%
Swisscom AG
1.34%
Eni SpA
1.31%
TotalEnergies SE
1.29%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
1.22%
Equinor ASA
1.20%
Sampo Oyj
1.20%
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
1.19%
Unilever Plc
1.18%
Frequently asked questions about QLVD and EFAV
How have the QLVD and EFAV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 27, 2026, QLVD is up 8.22% year-to-date (YTD), while EFAV has returned 7.82%. That puts QLVD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLVD or EFAV?
Year-to-date, the QLVD ETF saw -$8M in flows, compared to -$174M for EFAV.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLVD or EFAV?
Over the past year, QLVD had a volatility of 9.24%, while EFAV experienced 9.66%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLVD or EFAV?
As of July 27, 2026, QLVD holds $54.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while EFAV manages $5.30 B.
What sectors do the QLVD and EFAV ETFs invest in?
QLVD leans toward sectors like Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials. Meanwhile, EFAV focuses on Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the QLVD ETF and EFAV ETF?
QLVD top holdings include Novartis AG, Royal Bank of Canada and ASML Holding NV. EFAV holds in its top three: Iberdrola SA, SECOM Co., Ltd. and Novartis AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: QLVD or EFAV?
QLVD holds 174 securities with 27.71% of its assets in the top 15. EFAV has 254 securities and a top 15 weight of 20.13%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
