QLVDvsEFAVETF Comparison
ETF 1
QLVD
Northern Trust Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.45%
VS
Northern Trust Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility ETF (QLVD) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. QLVD's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials. In contrast, EFAV's top sector exposures are Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. QLVD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.2% for EFAV. QLVD is up 9% year-to-date (YTD) with -$10M in YTD flows. EFAV performs better with 10.84% YTD performance, and -$174M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLVD and EFAV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QLVD vs EFAV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLVD EFAV | -1.54%+0.44% | +4.93%+5.41% | +9.00%+10.84% | +11.23%+12.28% | +48.48%+53.70% | +37.68%+37.80% |
| Flows | QLVD EFAV | -$2M-$48M | -$2M+$2M | -$10M-$174M | -$13M-$471M | -$34M-$3.97B | -$40M-$4.12B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLVD EFAV | +7.93%+9.54% | +9.11%+9.60% | +10.17%+10.23% | +11.11%+11.40% |
| Max drawdown | QLVD EFAV | -2.48%-2.61% | -7.96%-6.83% | -9.60%-8.91% | -23.99%-27.07% |
| Max drawdown duration | QLVD EFAV | 17d18d | 150d150d | 157d155d | 968d1051d |
Trading data
QLVD | EFAV | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.07 | $93.98 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $33.95 | $93.26 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QLVD | EFAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QLVD | EFAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.07 | $93.98 |
| 1D performance | +0.37% | +0.77% |
| AuM | $52.87 M | $5.44 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
QLVD | EFAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Northern Trust | iShares |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index | MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index |
| N° of holdings | 172 | 251 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 16, 2019 | October 18, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QLVD
Japan
20.3%
Canada
15.24%
Switzerland
10.55%
United Kingdom
8.65%
France
7.17%
Other
38.09%
EFAV
Japan
27.21%
Switzerland
10.36%
United Kingdom
10.14%
Other
52.29%
Sectors
QLVD
Finance
28.69%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
12.46%
Industrials
11.26%
Healthcare
9.37%
Other
38.21%
EFAV
Finance
23.2%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
13.72%
Healthcare
11.6%
Industrials
10.85%
Energy
8.95%
Telecommunication.
8.37%
Other
23.3%
Advertisement
Diversification
QLVD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.17%
EFAV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.81%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
QLVD
Novartis AG
3.69%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.92%
Unilever Plc
2.22%
ASML Holding NV
2.21%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
1.74%
Air Liquide SA
1.65%
Nestlé SA
1.57%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.55%
Iberdrola SA
1.53%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.53%
Sanofi
1.51%
Shell Plc
1.38%
Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG
1.28%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
1.22%
Deutsche Telekom AG
1.17%
EFAV
SECOM Co., Ltd.
1.59%
Iberdrola SA
1.51%
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
1.47%
Shell Plc
1.46%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.46%
Eni SpA
1.43%
Equinor ASA
1.43%
Novartis AG
1.40%
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
1.37%
TotalEnergies SE
1.36%
Zurich Insurance Group AG
1.35%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
1.33%
Swisscom AG
1.26%
Unilever Plc
1.20%
Sampo Oyj
1.19%
Frequently asked questions about QLVD and EFAV
How have the QLVD and EFAV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, QLVD is up 9% year-to-date (YTD), while EFAV has returned 10.84%. That puts EFAV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLVD or EFAV?
Year-to-date, the QLVD ETF saw -$10M in flows, compared to -$174M for EFAV.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLVD or EFAV?
Over the past year, QLVD had a volatility of 9.11%, while EFAV experienced 9.6%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLVD or EFAV?
As of September 11, 2026, QLVD holds $52.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while EFAV manages $5.44 B.
What sectors do the QLVD and EFAV ETFs invest in?
QLVD leans toward sectors like Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials. Meanwhile, EFAV focuses on Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the QLVD ETF and EFAV ETF?
QLVD top holdings include Novartis AG, Royal Bank of Canada and Unilever Plc. EFAV holds in its top three: SECOM Co., Ltd., Iberdrola SA and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: QLVD or EFAV?
QLVD holds 173 securities with 27.17% of its assets in the top 15. EFAV has 254 securities and a top 15 weight of 20.81%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
