QLVvsRECSETF Comparison
ETF 1
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF
This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
+0.13%
VS
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF (QLV) and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QLV's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, RECS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. QLV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 0.15% for RECS. QLV is up 3.67% year-to-date (YTD) with +$19M in YTD flows. RECS performs worse with 3.17% YTD performance, and +$496M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLV and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QLV vs RECS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 05/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLV RECS | +3.36%+7.46% | +1.10%+1.64% | +3.67%+3.17% | +16.77%+28.71% | +48.83%+77.35% | +62.30%+89.81% |
| Flows | QLV RECS | -$11M+$139M | +$21M+$239M | +$19M+$496M | +$19M+$2.11B | -$34M+$4.38B | -$44M+$4.42B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLV RECS | +8.90%+14.84% | +8.18%+12.34% | +10.52%+14.56% | +13.06%+16.65% |
| Max drawdown | QLV RECS | -6.16%-8.79% | -6.16%-8.79% | -11.95%-18.49% | -18.21%-22.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | QLV RECS | 60d66d | 60d66d | 186d126d | 712d573d |
Trading data
QLV | RECS | |
Last sale 5/1/2026 at 7:59 PM | $74.44 | $41.95 |
| Previous close 05/01/2026 | $74.59 | $42.15 |
| Consolidated volume 05/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QLV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 5/1/2026 at 7:59 PM
Live
Closed
QLV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $74.44 | $41.95 |
| 1D performance | -0.20% | -0.47% |
| AuM | $169.28 M | $5.43 B |
| E/R | 0.09% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
QLV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | FlexShares | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 110 | 332 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 16, 2019 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QLV
USA
91.62%
Other
8.38%
RECS
USA
92.75%
Other
7.25%
Sectors
QLV
Information Techn.
30.66%
Health Care
13.43%
Financials
8.69%
Consumer Staples
8.3%
Communication Ser.
7.66%
Other
31.24%
RECS
Information Techn.
30%
Financials
11.82%
Consumer Discreti.
10.81%
Health Care
10.21%
Communication Ser.
7.97%
Industrials
7.74%
Other
21.45%
Advertisement
Diversification
QLV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.49%
RECS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.33%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
QLV
NVIDIA
5.75%
MICROSOFT-T
5.06%
APPLE
5.00%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
4.50%
EXXON
2.88%
ABBVIE
2.26%
PROCTERGAMBLE
2.26%
COSTCO WHOLESALE
2.12%
VISA INCORPORATION
2.01%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.91%
MCDONALD'S
1.75%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.65%
MASTERCARD
1.58%
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
1.43%
MERCK & CO INC
1.34%
RECS
NVIDIA
8.52%
APPLE
8.48%
MICROSOFT-T
6.18%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.79%
META PLATFORMS
2.45%
PROCTERGAMBLE
2.36%
EXXON
2.19%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.77%
WELLS FARGO
1.73%
BOOKING HOLDINGS
1.63%
CITIGROUP
1.37%
PFIZER
1.33%
MORGAN STANLEY
1.27%
CHEVRON TEXACO
1.18%
CHARLES SCHWAB
1.08%
Frequently asked questions about QLV and RECS
How have the QLV and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of May 1, 2026, QLV is up 3.67% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has returned 3.17%. That puts QLV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLV or RECS?
Year-to-date, the QLV ETF saw +$19M in flows, compared to +$496M for RECS.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLV or RECS?
Over the past year, QLV had a volatility of 8.18%, while RECS experienced 12.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLV or RECS?
As of May 1, 2026, QLV holds $169.28 M in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $5.43 B.
What sectors do the QLV and RECS ETFs invest in?
QLV leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QLV ETF and RECS ETF?
QLV top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QLV or RECS?
QLV holds 112 securities with 41.49% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 338 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.33%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QLV & RECS
Dan Philips on a Quality Low Volatility Approach
May 30, 2023
QLV
Michael Natale with FlexShares
August 2, 2022
QLV
Advertisement
Advertisement
