Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QLVvsQUSETF Comparison
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF (QLV) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. QLV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 0.15% for QUS. QLV is up 2.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. QUS performs worse with -0.13% YTD performance, and -$20M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLV and QUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QLV vs QUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLV QUS | -1.22%-2.69% | +2.24%-0.31% | +2.54%-0.13% | +14.89%+15.64% | +58.43%+66.81% | +72.20%+69.83% |
| Flows | QLV QUS | +$2M-$30M | +$4M-$23M | +$2M-$20M | +$5M-$83M | -$90M+$28M | -$56M+$63M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLV QUS | +6.41%+8.90% | +12.52%+14.33% | +10.58%+11.91% | +13.06%+14.40% |
| Max drawdown | QLV QUS | -1.98%-3.81% | -9.90%-10.91% | -11.95%-13.88% | -18.21%-22.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | QLV QUS | 9d12d | 48d46d | 186d128d | 712d701d |
QLV | QUS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $73.15 | $173.86 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $73.42 | $174.26 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QLV | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QLV | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $73.15 | $173.86 |
| 1D performance | -0.37% | -0.23% |
| AuM | $149.53 M | $1.51 B |
| E/R | 0.09% | 0.15% |
QLV | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | FlexShares | SPDR |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index | MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 107 | 511 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 16, 2019 | April 15, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QLV and QUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QLV is up 2.54% year-to-date (YTD), while QUS has lost -0.13%. That puts QLV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLV or QUS?
Year-to-date, the QLV ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to -$20M for QUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLV or QUS?
Over the past year, QLV had a volatility of 12.52%, while QUS experienced 14.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLV or QUS?
As of March 11, 2026, QLV holds $149.53 M in assets under management (AUM), while QUS manages $1.51 B.
What sectors do the QLV and QUS ETFs invest in?
QLV leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, QUS focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the QLV ETF and QUS ETF?
QLV top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE. QUS holds in its top three: APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and META PLATFORMS.
Which ETF is more diversified: QLV or QUS?
QLV holds 108 securities with 42.1% of its assets in the top 15. QUS has 542 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.04%.
Dan Philips on a Quality Low Volatility Approach
Michael Natale with FlexShares
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
