QLVvsJHMLETF Comparison
VS
Northern Trust US Quality Low Volatility ETF (QLV) and John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QLV's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, JHML's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. QLV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 0.32% for JHML. QLV is up 11.2% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. JHML performs better with 12.79% YTD performance, and -$750K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLV and JHML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QLV vs JHML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLV JHML | +0.02%-2.53% | +6.78%+1.97% | +11.20%+12.79% | +13.82%+16.81% | +56.22%+69.24% | +63.12%+70.59% |
| Flows | QLV JHML | -$2M+$4M | -$4M+$8M | +$4M-$750K | -$1M-$55M | -$96M-$66M | -$56M-$24M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLV JHML | +7.88%+10.00% | +7.70%+12.11% | +10.41%+14.33% | +12.90%+16.45% |
| Max drawdown | QLV JHML | -2.11%-3.95% | -6.16%-7.93% | -11.95%-18.02% | -18.21%-23.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | QLV JHML | 14d35d | 71d63d | 186d127d | 712d708d |
Trading data
QLV | JHML | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $79.01 | $89.53 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $79.50 | $89.63 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QLV | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QLV | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $79.01 | $89.53 |
| 1D performance | -0.62% | -0.11% |
| AuM | $164.93 M | $1.17 B |
| E/R | 0.09% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
QLV | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Northern Trust | John Hancock Investments |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index | John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 117 | 762 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 16, 2019 | September 28, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QLV
USA
95.34%
Other
4.66%
JHML
USA
96.66%
Other
3.34%
Sectors
QLV
Technology
34.32%
Finance
14.09%
Healthcare
13.63%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.96%
Other
27.99%
JHML
Technology
33.36%
Finance
17.01%
Industrials
11.13%
Healthcare
9.38%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.66%
Other
20.46%
Diversification
QLV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.82%
JHML
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.57%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
QLV
NVIDIA Corp.
5.92%
Microsoft Corp.
5.85%
Apple, Inc.
5.61%
Johnson & Johnson
4.27%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.42%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.31%
Visa, Inc.
2.17%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.00%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.88%
Broadcom Inc.
1.75%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.61%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.55%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.52%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.52%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
1.45%
JHML
Apple, Inc.
4.69%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.99%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.69%
Microsoft Corp.
2.65%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.44%
Broadcom Inc.
1.79%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.67%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.27%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.24%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.09%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
0.90%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.90%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.78%
Johnson & Johnson
0.76%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.72%
Frequently asked questions about QLV and JHML
How have the QLV and JHML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, QLV is up 11.2% year-to-date (YTD), while JHML has returned 12.79%. That puts JHML better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLV or JHML?
Year-to-date, the QLV ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to -$750K for JHML.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLV or JHML?
Over the past year, QLV had a volatility of 7.7%, while JHML experienced 12.11%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLV or JHML?
As of September 17, 2026, QLV holds $164.93 M in assets under management (AUM), while JHML manages $1.17 B.
What sectors do the QLV and JHML ETFs invest in?
QLV leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, JHML focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the QLV ETF and JHML ETF?
QLV top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Apple, Inc.. JHML holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Amazon.com, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QLV or JHML?
QLV holds 118 securities with 41.82% of its assets in the top 15. JHML has 770 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.57%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QLV & JHML
Dan Philips on a Quality Low Volatility Approach
May 30, 2023
QLV
Michael Natale with FlexShares
August 2, 2022
QLV
Advertisement
Advertisement
