QLVvsJHMLETF Comparison
ETF 1
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF
This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
+1.03%
VS
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF (QLV) and John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QLV's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, JHML's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. QLV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 0.32% for JHML. QLV is up 4.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. JHML performs better with 11.62% YTD performance, and +$11M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLV and JHML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QLV vs JHML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLV JHML | -1.77%+2.95% | +3.66%+13.00% | +4.02%+11.62% | +13.53%+26.47% | +48.50%+70.29% | +63.05%+79.06% |
| Flows | QLV JHML | -$4M+$13M | +$2M+$13M | +$6M+$11M | +$2M-$19M | -$95M-$55M | -$59M+$6M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLV JHML | +8.05%+14.49% | +7.55%+11.95% | +10.43%+14.32% | +12.95%+16.45% |
| Max drawdown | QLV JHML | -2.22%-3.53% | -6.16%-7.93% | -11.95%-18.02% | -18.21%-23.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | QLV JHML | 24d8d | 71d63d | 186d127d | 712d708d |
Trading data
QLV | JHML | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $74.39 | $89.11 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $74.75 | $88.25 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QLV | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QLV | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $74.39 | $89.11 |
| 1D performance | -0.49% | +0.97% |
| AuM | $156.14 M | $1.17 B |
| E/R | 0.09% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
QLV | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | FlexShares | John Hancock Investments |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index | John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 109 | 703 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 16, 2019 | September 28, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QLV
USA
91.55%
Other
8.45%
JHML
USA
95.79%
Other
4.21%
Sectors
QLV
Information Techn.
33.05%
Health Care
12.34%
Financials
8.62%
Communication Ser.
8.04%
Consumer Staples
8.04%
Other
29.92%
JHML
Information Techn.
27.83%
Financials
12.39%
Industrials
11.7%
Consumer Discreti.
10.21%
Health Care
8.6%
Communication Ser.
8.03%
Other
21.23%
Advertisement
Diversification
QLV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
42.43%
JHML
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.2%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
QLV
NVIDIA
6.81%
MICROSOFT-T
5.68%
APPLE
5.16%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
4.06%
EXXON
2.48%
PROCTERGAMBLE
2.26%
COSTCO WHOLESALE
2.05%
ABBVIE
1.99%
VISA INCORPORATION
1.99%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.95%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.84%
MCDONALD'S
1.60%
MASTERCARD
1.55%
BROADCOM LIMITED
1.54%
ANALOG DEVICES
1.46%
JHML
NVIDIA
4.60%
APPLE
3.90%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.16%
MICROSOFT-T
3.01%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.75%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.04%
META PLATFORMS
1.99%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.13%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
0.89%
ALPHABET INC-CL
0.87%
LILLY
0.82%
WALMART INC
0.80%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
0.77%
TESLA
0.75%
EXXON
0.72%
Frequently asked questions about QLV and JHML
How have the QLV and JHML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 18, 2026, QLV is up 4.02% year-to-date (YTD), while JHML has returned 11.62%. That puts JHML better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLV or JHML?
Year-to-date, the QLV ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to +$11M for JHML.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLV or JHML?
Over the past year, QLV had a volatility of 7.55%, while JHML experienced 11.95%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLV or JHML?
As of June 18, 2026, QLV holds $156.14 M in assets under management (AUM), while JHML manages $1.17 B.
What sectors do the QLV and JHML ETFs invest in?
QLV leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, JHML focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the QLV ETF and JHML ETF?
QLV top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE. JHML holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and AMAZON.COM INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: QLV or JHML?
QLV holds 110 securities with 42.43% of its assets in the top 15. JHML has 770 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.2%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QLV & JHML
Dan Philips on a Quality Low Volatility Approach
May 30, 2023
QLV
Michael Natale with FlexShares
August 2, 2022
QLV
Advertisement
Advertisement
