QLTYvsTENMETF Comparison
GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF (TENM) is part of the Options Strategies segment. QLTY's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, TENM's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. QLTY is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.53% for TENM. QLTY is up 10.34% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.63B in YTD flows. TENM performs worse with 8.46% YTD performance, and -$139M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLTY and TENM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QLTY vs TENM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLTY TENM | -1.27%-0.09% | +2.29%+2.13% | +10.34%+8.46% | +18.09%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | QLTY TENM | +$94M- | +$458M-$2M | +$1.63B-$139M | +$1.95B- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLTY TENM | +10.54%+4.90% | +12.65%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QLTY TENM | -2.71%-1.16% | -11.64%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QLTY TENM | 17d15d | 112dn/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
QLTY | TENM | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $42.53 | $27.64 |
| Previous close 09/16/2026 | $42.26 | $27.52 |
| Consolidated volume 09/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
QLTY | TENM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.53 | $27.64 |
| 1D performance | +0.64% | +0.44% |
| AuM | $5.08 B | $46.29 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.53% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15