BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

QLTYvsLCOWETF Comparison

ETF 1

QLTY

GMO U.S. Quality ETF

This fund is part of

US Multi-Factor

+1.32%

Full QLTY fund page

VS

ETF 2

LCOW

Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF

This fund is part of

US Multi-Factor

+1.32%

Full LCOW fund page

GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (LCOW) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QLTY's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, LCOW's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. QLTY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.49% for LCOW. QLTY is up 8.32% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.46B in YTD flows. LCOW performs worse with 7.96% YTD performance, and +$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLTY and LCOW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

QLTY vs LCOW performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 07/30/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	QLTY LCOW	-0.37%+0.58%	+4.38%+6.60%	+8.32%+7.96%	+21.29%+16.71%	n/an/a	n/an/a
Flows	QLTY LCOW	+$143M-$644K	+$467M+$1M	+$1.46B+$8M	+$1.93B+$11M	--	--

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	QLTY LCOW	+11.43%+11.54%	+12.77%+12.38%	n/an/a	n/an/a
Max drawdown	QLTY LCOW	-2.90%-3.97%	-11.64%-10.34%	n/an/a	n/an/a
Max drawdown duration	QLTY LCOW	15d28d	112d91d	n/an/a	n/an/a

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	QLTY	LCOW
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM	$41.78	$25.91
Previous close 07/30/2026	$41.49	$25.78
Consolidated volume 07/30/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of June 30, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

QLTY

is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	QLTY	LCOW
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	QLTY	LCOW
Last price	$41.78	$25.91
1D performance	+0.70%	+0.52%
AuM	$4.82 B	$25.75 M
E/R	0.5%	0.49%

Characteristics

	QLTY	LCOW
Management strategy	Active	Passive
Provider	GMO	PACER ETFs
Benchmark	-	S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index
N° of holdings	42	100
Asset class	-	-
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	November 13, 2023	May 6, 2025
ESG	No	No

More QLTY data on Trackinsight

More LCOW data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

QLTY

USA

98.07%

Other

1.93%

LCOW

USA

99.38%

Other

0.62%

Sectors

QLTY

Technology

47.5%

Healthcare

23.05%

Consumer Non-Cycl.

12.28%

Finance

8.13%

Other

9.05%

LCOW

Technology

54.2%

Healthcare

16.32%

Finance

15.18%

Other

14.3%

Diversification

QLTY

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

59.75%

LCOW

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

60.13%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of June 30, 2026

QLTY

Lam Research Corp.

6.06%

Microsoft Corp.

5.89%

Alphabet, Inc.

5.26%

Johnson & Johnson

4.55%

Apple, Inc.

4.41%

KLA Corp.

4.38%

Texas Instruments Incorporated

3.91%

Broadcom Inc.

3.90%

Meta Platforms, Inc.

3.85%

Amazon.com, Inc.

3.47%

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.

3.30%

UnitedHealth Group, Inc.

2.89%

Eli Lilly & Co.

2.80%

Visa, Inc.

2.71%

Aramark

2.37%

LCOW

Apple, Inc.

5.10%

Visa, Inc.

5.06%

AbbVie, Inc.

4.98%

Alphabet, Inc.

4.93%

NVIDIA Corp.

4.91%

Broadcom Inc.

4.84%

Microsoft Corp.

4.63%

Mastercard, Inc.

4.57%

Meta Platforms, Inc.

4.17%

Johnson & Johnson

3.52%

Lam Research Corp.

3.01%

Philip Morris International, Inc.

2.92%

Applied Materials, Inc.

2.55%

KLA Corp.

2.47%

Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

2.47%

Frequently asked questions about QLTY and LCOW

How have the QLTY and LCOW ETFs performed in 2026?

As of July 30, 2026, QLTY is up 8.32% year-to-date (YTD), while LCOW has returned 7.96%. That puts QLTY better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLTY or LCOW?

Year-to-date, the QLTY ETF saw +$1.46B in flows, compared to +$8M for LCOW.

Which ETF is more volatile: QLTY or LCOW?

Over the past year, QLTY had a volatility of 12.77%, while LCOW experienced 12.38%.

Which ETF is bigger: QLTY or LCOW?

As of July 30, 2026, QLTY holds $4.82 B in assets under management (AUM), while LCOW manages $25.75 M.

What sectors do the QLTY and LCOW ETFs invest in?

QLTY leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, LCOW focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Finance.

What are the top holdings of the QLTY ETF and LCOW ETF?

QLTY top holdings include Lam Research Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Alphabet, Inc.. LCOW holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., Visa, Inc. and AbbVie, Inc..

Which ETF is more diversified: QLTY or LCOW?

QLTY holds 42 securities with 59.75% of its assets in the top 15. LCOW has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.13%.

GMO's Tom Hancock on NYSE Arca: QLTY

July 25, 2024

QLTY

QLTYvsLCOWETF Comparison

GMO U.S. Quality ETF

Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF

QLTY vs LCOW performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the QLTY and LCOW ETFs performed in 2026?

As of July 30, 2026, QLTY is up 8.32% year-to-date (YTD), while LCOW has returned 7.96%. That puts QLTY better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLTY or LCOW?

Year-to-date, the QLTY ETF saw +$1.46B in flows, compared to +$8M for LCOW.

Which ETF is more volatile: QLTY or LCOW?

Over the past year, QLTY had a volatility of 12.77%, while LCOW experienced 12.38%.

Which ETF is bigger: QLTY or LCOW?

As of July 30, 2026, QLTY holds $4.82 B in assets under management (AUM), while LCOW manages $25.75 M.

What sectors do the QLTY and LCOW ETFs invest in?

QLTY leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, LCOW focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Finance.

What are the top holdings of the QLTY ETF and LCOW ETF?

QLTY top holdings include Lam Research Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Alphabet, Inc.. LCOW holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., Visa, Inc. and AbbVie, Inc..

Which ETF is more diversified: QLTY or LCOW?

QLTY holds 42 securities with 59.75% of its assets in the top 15. LCOW has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.13%.

GMO's Tom Hancock on NYSE Arca: QLTY

The ETF Industry Is Evolving Fast