QLTYvsLCOWETF Comparison
VS
GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (LCOW) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. QLTY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.49% for LCOW. QLTY is up 3.82% year-to-date (YTD) with +$941M in YTD flows. LCOW performs worse with 1.08% YTD performance, and +$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLTY and LCOW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QLTY vs LCOW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLTY LCOW | +9.46%+7.72% | +0.54%+0.27% | +3.82%+1.08% | +32.17%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | QLTY LCOW | +$211M+$5M | +$810M+$6M | +$941M+$7M | +$1.84B- | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLTY LCOW | +15.66%+15.53% | +12.98%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QLTY LCOW | -11.12%-10.34% | -11.64%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QLTY LCOW | 80d81d | 102dn/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
QLTY | LCOW | |
Last sale 4/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.68 | $24.08 |
| Previous close 04/24/2026 | $39.82 | $24.16 |
| Consolidated volume 04/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QLTY
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexQLTY | LCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QLTY | LCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.68 | $24.08 |
| 1D performance | -0.35% | -0.31% |
| AuM | $4.12 B | $22.94 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.49% |
Characteristics
QLTY | LCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | GMO | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index |
| N° of holdings | 38 | 98 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 13, 2023 | May 6, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QLTY
USA
94.9%
Other
5.1%
LCOW
USA
99.14%
Other
0.86%
Sectors
QLTY
Information Techn.
33.5%
Health Care
24.3%
Communication Ser.
10.9%
Consumer Discreti.
10.2%
Consumer Staples
8.9%
Other
12.2%
LCOW
Information Techn.
45.7%
Health Care
16.67%
Communication Ser.
10.38%
Financials
7.46%
Consumer Staples
7.44%
Other
12.35%
Advertisement
Diversification
QLTY
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.7%
LCOW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.69%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
QLTY
MICROSOFT-T
6.20%
ALPHABET INC-CL
5.30%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
5.20%
APPLE
4.80%
META PLATFORMS
4.50%
US5128073062
4.40%
BROADCOM LIMITED
4.20%
KLA CORPORATION
3.50%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
3.40%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.40%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
3.20%
ABBOTT LABS
3.10%
HILTON INC
2.90%
ACCENTURE PLC-A
2.80%
SALESFORCE INC
2.80%
LCOW
ALPHABET INC-CL
5.99%
APPLE
5.14%
NVIDIA
4.70%
MASTERCARD
4.61%
VISA INCORPORATION
4.59%
BROADCOM LIMITED
4.57%
ABBVIE
4.27%
META PLATFORMS
4.02%
MICROSOFT-T
3.68%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
3.65%
PHILLIP MORRIS
3.16%
BOOKING HOLDINGS
1.98%
PROCTERGAMBLE
1.87%
CISCO-T
1.81%
US5128073062
1.65%
Frequently asked questions about QLTY and LCOW
How have the QLTY and LCOW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 24, 2026, QLTY is up 3.82% year-to-date (YTD), while LCOW has returned 1.08%. That puts QLTY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLTY or LCOW?
Year-to-date, the QLTY ETF saw +$941M in flows, compared to +$7M for LCOW.
Which ETF is bigger: QLTY or LCOW?
As of April 24, 2026, QLTY holds $4.12 B in assets under management (AUM), while LCOW manages $22.94 M.
What sectors do the QLTY and LCOW ETFs invest in?
QLTY leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. Meanwhile, LCOW focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the QLTY ETF and LCOW ETF?
QLTY top holdings include MICROSOFT-T, ALPHABET INC-CL and JOHNSON&JOHNSON. LCOW holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, APPLE and NVIDIA.
Which ETF is more diversified: QLTY or LCOW?
QLTY holds 38 securities with 59.7% of its assets in the top 15. LCOW has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 55.69%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QLTY & LCOW
Advertisement
