QLTYvsHAPIETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
HAPI
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF
GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF (HAPI) is part of the segment. QLTY's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, HAPI's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. QLTY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.35% for HAPI. QLTY is up 8.32% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.46B in YTD flows. HAPI performs worse with 8.27% YTD performance, and +$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLTY and HAPI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QLTY vs HAPI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLTY HAPI | -0.37%+0.02% | +4.38%+2.95% | +8.32%+8.27% | +21.29%+15.23% | n/a+68.59% | n/an/a |
| Flows | QLTY HAPI | +$143M- | +$467M- | +$1.46B+$6M | +$1.93B+$18M | -+$35M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLTY HAPI | +11.43%+11.79% | +12.77%+12.14% | n/a+15.08% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QLTY HAPI | -2.90%-3.95% | -11.64%-7.57% | n/a-19.45% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QLTY HAPI | 15d56d | 112d89d | n/a126d | n/an/a |
Trading data
QLTY | HAPI | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.78 | $45.04 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $41.49 | $44.46 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QLTY
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexQLTY | HAPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QLTY | HAPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.78 | $45.04 |
| 1D performance | +0.70% | +1.31% |
| AuM | $4.82 B | $483.85 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
QLTY | HAPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | GMO | Harbor Capital |
| Benchmark | - | Human Capital Factor Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 42 | 198 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 13, 2023 | October 12, 2022 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QLTY
USA
98.07%
Other
1.93%
HAPI
USA
96.68%
Other
3.32%
Sectors
QLTY
Technology
47.5%
Healthcare
23.05%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
12.28%
Finance
8.13%
Other
9.05%
HAPI
Technology
44.64%
Finance
12.5%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
12%
Industrials
8.66%
Healthcare
8.59%
Other
13.61%
Advertisement
Diversification
QLTY
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.75%
HAPI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.62%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
QLTY
Lam Research Corp.
6.06%
Microsoft Corp.
5.89%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.26%
Johnson & Johnson
4.55%
Apple, Inc.
4.41%
KLA Corp.
4.38%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
3.91%
Broadcom Inc.
3.90%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.85%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.47%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.30%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
2.89%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.80%
Visa, Inc.
2.71%
Aramark
2.37%
HAPI
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.49%
Apple, Inc.
5.20%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.17%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.94%
Microsoft Corp.
4.36%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.03%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
3.30%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.11%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.61%
Netflix, Inc.
2.40%
KLA Corp.
2.30%
Chevron Corp.
1.78%
Lam Research Corp.
1.69%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
1.66%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
1.59%
Frequently asked questions about QLTY and HAPI
How have the QLTY and HAPI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, QLTY is up 8.32% year-to-date (YTD), while HAPI has returned 8.27%. That puts QLTY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLTY or HAPI?
Year-to-date, the QLTY ETF saw +$1.46B in flows, compared to +$6M for HAPI.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLTY or HAPI?
Over the past year, QLTY had a volatility of 12.77%, while HAPI experienced 12.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLTY or HAPI?
As of July 30, 2026, QLTY holds $4.82 B in assets under management (AUM), while HAPI manages $483.85 M.
What sectors do the QLTY and HAPI ETFs invest in?
QLTY leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, HAPI focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the QLTY ETF and HAPI ETF?
QLTY top holdings include Lam Research Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Alphabet, Inc.. HAPI holds in its top three: Amazon.com, Inc., Apple, Inc. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QLTY or HAPI?
QLTY holds 42 securities with 59.75% of its assets in the top 15. HAPI has 198 securities and a top 15 weight of 49.62%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QLTY & HAPI
GMO's Tom Hancock on NYSE Arca: QLTY
July 25, 2024
QLTY
First Trust Launches the First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF
November 29, 2023
HAPI
Advertisement
Advertisement
