QLDvsNVDLETF Comparison
VS
ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF (QLD) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) belong to the same industry segment: Leveraged Equity. QLD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.98%, versus 1.06% for NVDL. QLD is up 22.46% year-to-date (YTD) with +$846M in YTD flows. NVDL performs worse with 6.68% YTD performance, and -$1.74B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLD and NVDL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QLD vs NVDL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLD NVDL | -10.38%-15.41% | +1.40%-5.55% | +22.46%+6.68% | +22.22%+8.78% | +198.35%+659.84% | +114.74%n/a |
| Flows | QLD NVDL | +$211M+$4M | +$730M-$439M | +$846M-$1.74B | +$1.32B-$1.53B | +$1.18B-$1.17B | +$1.72B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLD NVDL | +37.82%+74.89% | +39.95%+75.00% | +41.17%+92.45% | +46.40%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QLD NVDL | -14.47%-22.16% | -25.08%-42.21% | -42.40%-67.57% | -63.41%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QLD NVDL | 17d16d | 169d194d | 212d401d | 878dn/a |
Trading data
QLD | NVDL | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $86.15 | $30.91 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $86.26 | $31.32 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 25, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QLD | NVDL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QLD | NVDL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $86.15 | $30.91 |
| 1D performance | -0.13% | -1.31% |
| AuM | $13.72 B | $3.20 B |
| E/R | 0.98% | 1.06% |
Characteristics
QLD | NVDL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | GraniteShares |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ-100 Index | NVIDIA |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 19, 2006 | December 13, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Exposure data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about QLD and NVDL
How have the QLD and NVDL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, QLD is up 22.46% year-to-date (YTD), while NVDL has returned 6.68%. That puts QLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLD or NVDL?
Year-to-date, the QLD ETF saw +$846M in flows, compared to -$1.74B for NVDL.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLD or NVDL?
Over the past year, QLD had a volatility of 39.95%, while NVDL experienced 75%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLD or NVDL?
As of October 23, 2026, QLD holds $13.72 B in assets under management (AUM), while NVDL manages $3.20 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about QLD & NVDL
Chinese Artificial Intelligence (AI) DeepSeek: ETF Winners & Losers
January 27, 2025
NVDL
Advertisement
Advertisement
