QLDvsBULZETF Comparison
ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF (QLD) and MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) belong to the same industry segment: Leveraged Equity. QLD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.98%, versus 0.95% for BULZ. QLD is up 22.46% year-to-date (YTD) with +$846M in YTD flows. BULZ performs better with 25.36% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLD and BULZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QLD vs BULZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLD BULZ | -10.38%-31.32% | +1.40%-7.28% | +22.46%+25.36% | +22.22%+21.97% | +198.35%+426.95% | +114.74%+20.51% |
| Flows | QLD BULZ | +$211M- | +$730M- | +$846M- | +$1.32B- | +$1.18B- | +$1.72B+$3.80B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLD BULZ | +37.82%+89.07% | +39.95%+89.84% | +41.17%+85.80% | +46.40%+94.25% |
| Max drawdown | QLD BULZ | -14.47%-31.32% | -25.08%-55.29% | -42.40%-68.03% | -63.41%-94.45% |
| Max drawdown duration | QLD BULZ | 17d30d | 169d143d | 212d174d | 878d1621d |
QLD | BULZ | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $86.15 | $32.38 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $86.26 | $32.56 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QLD | BULZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QLD | BULZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $86.15 | $32.38 |
| 1D performance | -0.13% | -0.55% |
| AuM | $13.72 B | $2.76 B |
| E/R | 0.98% | 0.95% |
