QLCvsRECSETF Comparison
VS
Northern Trust US Quality Large Cap ETF (QLC) and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. QLC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.26%, versus 0.15% for RECS. QLC is up 13% year-to-date (YTD) with +$323M in YTD flows. RECS performs worse with 10.01% YTD performance, and +$815M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLC and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QLC vs RECS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLC RECS | -0.32%-0.31% | +2.63%+2.12% | +13.00%+10.01% | +14.49%+10.70% | +102.29%+89.64% | +91.81%+82.79% |
| Flows | QLC RECS | +$25M+$78M | +$134M+$108M | +$323M+$815M | +$359M+$1.33B | +$715M+$4.62B | +$729M+$4.81B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLC RECS | +9.96%+9.60% | +12.78%+11.76% | +14.95%+14.41% | +17.03%+16.51% |
| Max drawdown | QLC RECS | -3.77%-2.34% | -8.90%-8.79% | -18.73%-18.49% | -23.78%-22.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | QLC RECS | 77d32d | 63d66d | 124d126d | 702d573d |
Trading data
QLC | RECS | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $89.39 | $44.93 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $90.87 | $45.62 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QLC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QLC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $89.39 | $44.93 |
| 1D performance | -1.63% | -1.51% |
| AuM | $1.15 B | $6.13 B |
| E/R | 0.26% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
QLC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Northern Trust | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 155 | 346 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 23, 2015 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QLC
USA
97.63%
Other
2.37%
RECS
USA
98.88%
Other
1.12%
Sectors
QLC
Technology
46.32%
Finance
14.73%
Healthcare
9.68%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.81%
Other
21.47%
RECS
Technology
44.95%
Finance
12.49%
Healthcare
8.12%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.44%
Other
27%
Advertisement
Diversification
QLC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.1%
RECS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.54%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
QLC
NVIDIA Corp.
8.10%
Apple, Inc.
5.96%
Microsoft Corp.
4.08%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.95%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.49%
Broadcom Inc.
2.65%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.43%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.26%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.86%
Johnson & Johnson
1.85%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.83%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.58%
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
1.51%
Bank of America Corp.
1.29%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.25%
RECS
NVIDIA Corp.
12.50%
Apple, Inc.
12.08%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.58%
US81369Y8527
2.65%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.39%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.35%
US92204A8844
1.95%
Bank of America Corp.
1.69%
Chevron Corp.
1.56%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
1.35%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.25%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
1.09%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.06%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.03%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
1.01%
Frequently asked questions about QLC and RECS
How have the QLC and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 29, 2026, QLC is up 13% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has returned 10.01%. That puts QLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLC or RECS?
Year-to-date, the QLC ETF saw +$323M in flows, compared to +$815M for RECS.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLC or RECS?
Over the past year, QLC had a volatility of 12.78%, while RECS experienced 11.76%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLC or RECS?
As of October 29, 2026, QLC holds $1.15 B in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $6.13 B.
What sectors do the QLC and RECS ETFs invest in?
QLC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the QLC ETF and RECS ETF?
QLC top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QLC or RECS?
QLC holds 156 securities with 44.1% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 448 securities and a top 15 weight of 48.54%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
