New

ETF model portfolios designed for real investor needs. Discover →

Advertisement
Advertisement

QLCvsRECSETF Comparison

ETF 1
QLC

FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index ETF

This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
+0%
VS
ETF 2
RECS

Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF

This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
+0%

FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index ETF (QLC) and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QLC's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. In contrast, RECS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. QLC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.26%, versus 0.15% for RECS. QLC is up 5.75% year-to-date (YTD) with +$123M in YTD flows. RECS performs worse with 3.01% YTD performance, and +$500M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLC and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

QLC vs RECS performance and flow charts

Performance

-20246810%Mar 24Mar 31Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22

Cumulative Flows

0 M50 M100 M150 M200 MMar 24Mar 31Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/27/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
QLC
RECS
+12.19%+7.92%
+3.49%+1.61%
+5.75%+3.01%
+36.81%+31.71%
+94.39%+78.54%
+98.33%+90.79%
Flows
QLC
RECS
+$24M+$197M
+$86M+$305M
+$123M+$500M
+$314M+$2.17B
+$533M+$4.38B
+$565M+$4.42B
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
QLC
RECS
+15.67%+14.89%
+12.79%+12.37%
+15.06%+14.64%
+17.03%+16.65%
Max drawdown
QLC
RECS
-8.90%-8.79%
-8.90%-8.79%
-18.73%-18.49%
-23.78%-22.06%
Max drawdown duration
QLC
RECS
63d66d
63d66d
124d126d
702d573d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
QLC
RECS
Last sale
4/28/2026 at 4:01 PM
$84.82
$42.04
Previous close
04/27/2026
$85.50
$42.24
Consolidated volume
04/27/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
QLC
RECS
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/28/2026 at 4:01 PM
Live
Closed
QLC
RECS
Last price
$84.82
$42.04
1D performance
-0.80%
-0.47%
AuM$890.81 M$5.42 B
E/R0.26%0.15%
Characteristics
QLC
RECS
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderFlexSharesColumbia Threadneedle Investments
BenchmarkNorthern Trust Quality Large Cap IndexBeta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index
N° of holdings170332
Asset classEquitiesEquities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateSeptember 23, 2015September 25, 2019
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

QLC
USA
95.97%
Other
4.03%
RECS
USA
92.75%
Other
7.25%

Sectors

QLC
Information Techn.
32.61%
Financials
13.67%
Communication Ser.
12.24%
Health Care
11.31%
Consumer Discreti.
7.54%
Other
22.64%
RECS
Information Techn.
30%
Financials
11.82%
Consumer Discreti.
10.81%
Health Care
10.21%
Communication Ser.
7.97%
Industrials
7.74%
Other
21.45%
Advertisement

Diversification

QLC

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

43.82%
RECS

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

44.33%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of March 31, 2026
QLC
NVIDIA
7.16%
APPLE
6.98%
ALPHABET INC-CL
4.01%
MICROSOFT-T
3.91%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.60%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.70%
AMAZON.COM INC
2.22%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
2.06%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
2.00%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.91%
CITIGROUP
1.67%
META PLATFORMS
1.67%
CISCO-T
1.44%
BK OF AMERICA CO
1.32%
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP
1.17%
RECS
NVIDIA
8.52%
APPLE
8.48%
MICROSOFT-T
6.18%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.79%
META PLATFORMS
2.45%
PROCTERGAMBLE
2.36%
EXXON
2.19%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.77%
WELLS FARGO
1.73%
BOOKING HOLDINGS
1.63%
CITIGROUP
1.37%
PFIZER
1.33%
MORGAN STANLEY
1.27%
CHEVRON TEXACO
1.18%
CHARLES SCHWAB
1.08%
Frequently asked questions about QLC and RECS

How have the QLC and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?

As of April 27, 2026, QLC is up 5.75% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has returned 3.01%. That puts QLC better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLC or RECS?

Year-to-date, the QLC ETF saw +$123M in flows, compared to +$500M for RECS.

Which ETF is more volatile: QLC or RECS?

Over the past year, QLC had a volatility of 12.79%, while RECS experienced 12.37%.

Which ETF is bigger: QLC or RECS?

As of April 27, 2026, QLC holds $890.81 M in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $5.42 B.

What sectors do the QLC and RECS ETFs invest in?

QLC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.

What are the top holdings of the QLC ETF and RECS ETF?

QLC top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.

Which ETF is more diversified: QLC or RECS?

QLC holds 172 securities with 43.82% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 338 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.33%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Webcast on Demand

Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution

Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.

Accepted for 1 CE Credit

Calamos Webcast