QLCvsLCTUETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
LCTU
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
Northern Trust US Quality Large Cap ETF (QLC) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. QLC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.26%, versus 0.3% for LCTU. QLC is up 12.7% year-to-date (YTD) with +$222M in YTD flows. LCTU performs worse with 10.33% YTD performance, and -$321M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLC and LCTU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QLC vs LCTU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLC LCTU | -2.54%-2.16% | +0.98%+0.94% | +12.70%+10.33% | +19.35%+14.19% | +89.53%+72.11% | +94.82%+70.43% |
| Flows | QLC LCTU | +$24M+$4M | +$67M-$271M | +$222M-$321M | +$319M-$310M | +$617M-$891M | +$625M-$796M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLC LCTU | +10.95%+11.19% | +13.03%+12.98% | +15.12%+15.30% | +17.11%+17.40% |
| Max drawdown | QLC LCTU | -3.15%-3.16% | -8.90%-9.37% | -18.73%-19.80% | -23.78%-25.94% |
| Max drawdown duration | QLC LCTU | 34d16d | 63d93d | 124d127d | 702d744d |
Trading data
QLC | LCTU | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 4:33 PM | $91.77 | $81.69 |
| Previous close 09/16/2026 | $90.90 | $80.81 |
| Consolidated volume 09/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LCTU
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexQLC | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 4:33 PM
Live
Closed
QLC | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $91.77 | $81.69 |
| 1D performance | +0.96% | +1.09% |
| AuM | $1.05 B | $1.23 B |
| E/R | 0.26% | 0.3% |
Characteristics
QLC | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Northern Trust | iShares |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 176 | 324 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 23, 2015 | April 8, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QLC
USA
97.8%
Other
2.2%
LCTU
USA
98.48%
Other
1.52%
Sectors
QLC
Technology
45.38%
Finance
17.02%
Healthcare
9.91%
Other
27.69%
LCTU
Technology
43.01%
Finance
14.56%
Healthcare
9.06%
Industrials
8.45%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.36%
Other
16.55%
Advertisement
Diversification
QLC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.47%
LCTU
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.92%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
QLC
Apple, Inc.
7.31%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.08%
Microsoft Corp.
4.24%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.08%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.65%
Broadcom Inc.
2.93%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.59%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.97%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.85%
Johnson & Johnson
1.81%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.65%
Bank of America Corp.
1.45%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.40%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.26%
GE Aerospace
1.21%
LCTU
Apple, Inc.
7.65%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.20%
Microsoft Corp.
4.09%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.82%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.60%
Broadcom Inc.
2.38%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.01%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.82%
Bank of America Corp.
1.63%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.38%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.30%
Tesla, Inc.
1.29%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.27%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.27%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.21%
Frequently asked questions about QLC and LCTU
How have the QLC and LCTU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 16, 2026, QLC is up 12.7% year-to-date (YTD), while LCTU has returned 10.33%. That puts QLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLC or LCTU?
Year-to-date, the QLC ETF saw +$222M in flows, compared to -$321M for LCTU.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLC or LCTU?
Over the past year, QLC had a volatility of 13.03%, while LCTU experienced 12.98%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLC or LCTU?
As of September 16, 2026, QLC holds $1.05 B in assets under management (AUM), while LCTU manages $1.23 B.
What sectors do the QLC and LCTU ETFs invest in?
QLC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, LCTU focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the QLC ETF and LCTU ETF?
QLC top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp.. LCTU holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: QLC or LCTU?
QLC holds 177 securities with 44.47% of its assets in the top 15. LCTU has 325 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.92%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
