Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QINTvsMFDXETF Comparison
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) is part of the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. QINT's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, MFDX's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Materials. QINT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.4% for MFDX. QINT is up 3.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$74M in YTD flows. MFDX performs worse with 3.56% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QINT and MFDX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QINT vs MFDX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QINT MFDX | -5.38%-5.42% | +4.18%+5.15% | +3.64%+3.56% | +31.35%+27.67% | +74.89%+64.28% | +55.63%+62.06% |
| Flows | QINT MFDX | +$13M- | +$87M- | +$74M- | +$180M+$36M | +$196M+$168M | +$292M+$222M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QINT MFDX | +14.31%+13.68% | +15.89%+14.23% | +13.87%+12.84% | +15.64%+14.68% |
| Max drawdown | QINT MFDX | -6.37%-7.42% | -13.48%-11.25% | -13.48%-11.25% | -33.77%-25.97% |
| Max drawdown duration | QINT MFDX | 14d11d | 37d35d | 37d35d | 932d700d |
QINT | MFDX | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $64.33 | $39.56 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $65.32 | $40.02 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QINT | MFDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QINT | MFDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $64.33 | $39.56 |
| 1D performance | -1.52% | -1.15% |
| AuM | $530.24 M | $421.41 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.4% |
QINT | MFDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | American Century Investments | PIMCO |
| Benchmark | Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index | RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Dev. ex-US Index |
| N° of holdings | 344 | 1129 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 10, 2018 | August 31, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QINT and MFDX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QINT is up 3.64% year-to-date (YTD), while MFDX has returned 3.56%. That puts QINT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QINT or MFDX?
Year-to-date, the QINT ETF saw +$74M in flows, compared to - for MFDX.
Which ETF is more volatile: QINT or MFDX?
Over the past year, QINT had a volatility of 15.89%, while MFDX experienced 14.23%.
Which ETF is bigger: QINT or MFDX?
As of March 11, 2026, QINT holds $530.24 M in assets under management (AUM), while MFDX manages $421.41 M.
What sectors do the QINT and MFDX ETFs invest in?
QINT leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, MFDX focuses on Industrials, Financials and Materials.
What are the top holdings of the QINT ETF and MFDX ETF?
QINT top holdings include HSBC HOLDINGS, BNP PARIBAS and RIO TINTO. MFDX holds in its top three: BANCO SANTANDER SA, BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO and NOVARTIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: QINT or MFDX?
QINT holds 365 securities with 17.86% of its assets in the top 15. MFDX has 1192 securities and a top 15 weight of 10.73%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
