Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QINTvsINTFETF Comparison
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. iShares International Equity Factor ETF (INTF) is part of the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. QINT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.16% for INTF. QINT is up 3.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$74M in YTD flows. INTF performs worse with 2.54% YTD performance, and +$136M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QINT and INTF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QINT vs INTF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QINT INTF | -5.38%-5.58% | +4.18%+4.23% | +3.64%+2.54% | +31.35%+27.82% | +74.89%+68.59% | +55.63%+61.80% |
| Flows | QINT INTF | +$13M+$49M | +$87M+$169M | +$74M+$136M | +$180M+$1.27B | +$196M+$1.48B | +$292M+$1.62B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QINT INTF | +14.31%+14.93% | +15.89%+15.97% | +13.87%+14.03% | +15.64%+15.41% |
| Max drawdown | QINT INTF | -6.37%-7.35% | -13.48%-13.30% | -13.48%-13.30% | -33.77%-29.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | QINT INTF | 14d11d | 37d37d | 37d37d | 932d872d |
QINT | INTF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 5:08 PM | $64.56 | $38.42 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $65.32 | $38.77 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QINT | INTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QINT | INTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $64.56 | $38.42 |
| 1D performance | -1.17% | -0.90% |
| AuM | $530.24 M | $3.10 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.16% |
QINT | INTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | American Century Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index | STOXX International Equity Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 344 | 444 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 10, 2018 | April 28, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QINT and INTF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QINT is up 3.64% year-to-date (YTD), while INTF has returned 2.54%. That puts QINT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QINT or INTF?
Year-to-date, the QINT ETF saw +$74M in flows, compared to +$136M for INTF.
Which ETF is more volatile: QINT or INTF?
Over the past year, QINT had a volatility of 15.89%, while INTF experienced 15.97%.
Which ETF is bigger: QINT or INTF?
As of March 11, 2026, QINT holds $530.24 M in assets under management (AUM), while INTF manages $3.10 B.
What sectors do the QINT and INTF ETFs invest in?
QINT leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, INTF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QINT ETF and INTF ETF?
QINT top holdings include HSBC HOLDINGS, BNP PARIBAS and RIO TINTO. INTF holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, NOVARTIS and ROCHE.
Which ETF is more diversified: QINT or INTF?
QINT holds 365 securities with 17.86% of its assets in the top 15. INTF has 469 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.12%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
