Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QINTvsGSIEETF Comparison
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. QINT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.25% for GSIE. QINT is up 3.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$74M in YTD flows. GSIE performs worse with 2.19% YTD performance, and +$216M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QINT and GSIE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QINT vs GSIE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QINT GSIE | -5.38%-4.88% | +4.18%+3.54% | +3.64%+2.19% | +31.35%+25.73% | +74.89%+60.66% | +55.63%+53.41% |
| Flows | QINT GSIE | +$13M+$41M | +$87M+$216M | +$74M+$216M | +$180M+$625M | +$196M+$711M | +$292M+$1.79B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QINT GSIE | +14.31%+13.10% | +15.89%+14.72% | +13.87%+12.87% | +15.64%+14.16% |
| Max drawdown | QINT GSIE | -6.37%-7.37% | -13.48%-13.08% | -13.48%-13.08% | -33.77%-29.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | QINT GSIE | 14d10d | 37d37d | 37d37d | 932d911d |
QINT | GSIE | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $64.46 | $42.84 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $65.32 | $43.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QINT | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QINT | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $64.46 | $42.84 |
| 1D performance | -1.32% | -1.11% |
| AuM | $530.24 M | $5.20 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.25% |
QINT | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | American Century Investments | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 344 | 598 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 10, 2018 | November 6, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QINT and GSIE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QINT is up 3.64% year-to-date (YTD), while GSIE has returned 2.19%. That puts QINT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QINT or GSIE?
Year-to-date, the QINT ETF saw +$74M in flows, compared to +$216M for GSIE.
Which ETF is more volatile: QINT or GSIE?
Over the past year, QINT had a volatility of 15.89%, while GSIE experienced 14.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: QINT or GSIE?
As of March 11, 2026, QINT holds $530.24 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSIE manages $5.20 B.
What sectors do the QINT and GSIE ETFs invest in?
QINT leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GSIE focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QINT ETF and GSIE ETF?
QINT top holdings include HSBC HOLDINGS, BNP PARIBAS and RIO TINTO. GSIE holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and NOVARTIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: QINT or GSIE?
QINT holds 365 securities with 17.86% of its assets in the top 15. GSIE has 629 securities and a top 15 weight of 12.67%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
