BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

QIDXvsCLSEETF Comparison

ETF 1

QIDX

Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

This fund is part of

US Multi-Factor

-0.6%

Full QIDX fund page

VS

ETF 2

CLSE

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF

This fund is part of

Alternatives

-0.27%

Full CLSE fund page

Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) is part of the Alternatives segment. QIDX's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, CLSE's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. QIDX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 1.44% for CLSE. QIDX is up 5.76% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. CLSE performs better with 17.85% YTD performance, and +$182M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QIDX and CLSE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

QIDX vs CLSE performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 05/06/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	QIDX CLSE	+4.64%+11.07%	+0.86%+12.94%	+5.76%+17.85%	+13.46%+46.07%	n/a+121.50%	n/an/a
Flows	QIDX CLSE	-+$86M	-+$143M	-+$182M	+$9M+$238M	-+$369M	--

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	QIDX CLSE	+13.29%+15.62%	+11.36%+12.72%	n/a+13.32%	n/an/a
Max drawdown	QIDX CLSE	-7.15%-4.60%	-7.15%-4.60%	n/a-15.76%	n/an/a
Max drawdown duration	QIDX CLSE	46d40d	46d40d	n/a188d	n/an/a

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	QIDX	CLSE
Last sale 5/7/2026 at 7:04 PM	$11.24	$32.69
Previous close 05/07/2026	$11.32	$32.26
Consolidated volume 05/07/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Main metrics

Last update 5/7/2026 at 7:04 PM

Live

Closed

	QIDX	CLSE
Last price	$11.24	$32.69
1D performance	-0.70%	+1.32%
AuM	$38.04 M	$515.90 M
E/R	0.5%	1.44%

Characteristics

	QIDX	CLSE
Management strategy	Active	Active
Provider	Indexperts	Convergence Investment Partners LLC
Benchmark	-	-
N° of holdings	129	627
Asset class	-	-
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	January 1, 2025	February 22, 2022
ESG	No	No

More QIDX data on Trackinsight

More CLSE data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

QIDX

USA

94.02%

Other

5.98%

CLSE

Data will be available soon

Sectors

QIDX

Information Techn.

19.71%

Industrials

15.81%

Health Care

12.97%

Consumer Discreti.

11.8%

Consumer Staples

8.88%

Communication Ser.

8.54%

Other

22.29%

CLSE

Data will be available soon

Diversification

QIDX

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

31.66%

CLSE

Data will be available soon

Top 15 holdings

Data as of March 31, 2026

QIDX

ALPHABET INC-CL

2.91%

ARISTA NETWORKS

2.90%

THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC

2.64%

EXXON

2.47%

HEICO

2.26%

CISCO-T

2.03%

APPLE

1.99%

WILLIAMS

1.97%

NRG ENERGY

1.90%

T-MOBILE US INC

1.89%

AMERISOURCEBERGEN

1.82%

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS

1.81%

ALTRIA GROUP

1.74%

F5 INC

1.68%

KROGER

1.66%

CLSE

Data will be available soon

Frequently asked questions about QIDX and CLSE

How have the QIDX and CLSE ETFs performed in 2026?

As of May 6, 2026, QIDX is up 5.76% year-to-date (YTD), while CLSE has returned 17.85%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QIDX or CLSE?

Year-to-date, the QIDX ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$182M for CLSE.

Which ETF is more volatile: QIDX or CLSE?

Over the past year, QIDX had a volatility of 11.36%, while CLSE experienced 12.72%.

Which ETF is bigger: QIDX or CLSE?

As of May 6, 2026, QIDX holds $38.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while CLSE manages $515.90 M.

What sectors do the QIDX and CLSE ETFs invest in?

QIDX leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, CLSE focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.

What are the top holdings of the QIDX ETF and CLSE ETF?

QIDX top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, ARISTA NETWORKS and THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC. CLSE holds in its top three: NVIDIA, BROADCOM LIMITED and US5128073062.

QIDXvsCLSEETF Comparison

Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF

QIDX vs CLSE performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the QIDX and CLSE ETFs performed in 2026?

As of May 6, 2026, QIDX is up 5.76% year-to-date (YTD), while CLSE has returned 17.85%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QIDX or CLSE?

Year-to-date, the QIDX ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$182M for CLSE.

Which ETF is more volatile: QIDX or CLSE?

Over the past year, QIDX had a volatility of 11.36%, while CLSE experienced 12.72%.

Which ETF is bigger: QIDX or CLSE?

As of May 6, 2026, QIDX holds $38.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while CLSE manages $515.90 M.

What sectors do the QIDX and CLSE ETFs invest in?

QIDX leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, CLSE focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.

What are the top holdings of the QIDX ETF and CLSE ETF?

QIDX top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, ARISTA NETWORKS and THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC. CLSE holds in its top three: NVIDIA, BROADCOM LIMITED and US5128073062.

Which ETF is more diversified: QIDX or CLSE?

QIDX holds 129 securities with 31.66% of its assets in the top 15. CLSE has 673 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.42%.

Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution