Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QGROvsABOTETF Comparison
American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. QGRO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.59% for ABOT. QGRO is down -4.62% year-to-date (YTD) with -$44M in YTD flows. ABOT performs worse with -11.29% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QGRO and ABOT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QGRO vs ABOT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QGRO ABOT | -0.94%-0.21% | -5.36%-14.16% | -4.62%-11.29% | +18.41%+2.26% | +83.34%+57.27% | +80.94%+42.86% |
| Flows | QGRO ABOT | -$16M- | +$60M- | -$44M- | +$772M-$3M | +$1.29B-$62M | +$1.39B-$84M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QGRO ABOT | +16.78%+19.93% | +21.66%+21.51% | +17.98%+17.99% | +21.22%+19.58% |
| Max drawdown | QGRO ABOT | -8.94%-17.54% | -15.12%-18.72% | -23.75%-22.58% | -31.85%-29.64% |
| Max drawdown duration | QGRO ABOT | 62d90d | 37d135d | 156d134d | 794d801d |
QGRO | ABOT | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $106.78 | $34.10 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $108.63 | $34.66 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QGRO | ABOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QGRO | ABOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $106.78 | $34.10 |
| 1D performance | -1.70% | -1.61% |
| AuM | $2.10 B | $4.33 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.59% |
QGRO | ABOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | American Century Investments | Abacus FCF Advisors |
| Benchmark | American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index | Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders Index |
| N° of holdings | 179 | 48 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 11, 2018 | December 8, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QGRO and ABOT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, QGRO is down -4.62% year-to-date (YTD), while ABOT has lost -11.29%. That puts QGRO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QGRO or ABOT?
Year-to-date, the QGRO ETF saw -$44M in flows, compared to - for ABOT.
Which ETF is more volatile: QGRO or ABOT?
Over the past year, QGRO had a volatility of 21.66%, while ABOT experienced 21.51%.
Which ETF is bigger: QGRO or ABOT?
As of March 10, 2026, QGRO holds $2.10 B in assets under management (AUM), while ABOT manages $4.33 M.
What sectors do the QGRO and ABOT ETFs invest in?
QGRO leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. Meanwhile, ABOT focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the QGRO ETF and ABOT ETF?
QGRO top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, US5128073062 and AMPHENOL. ABOT holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: QGRO or ABOT?
QGRO holds 190 securities with 40.99% of its assets in the top 15. ABOT has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.03%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
