Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QEFAvsGSIDETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF
SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. QEFA's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, GSID's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. QEFA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.25% for GSID. QEFA is up 2.74% year-to-date (YTD) with +$23M in YTD flows. GSID performs better with 3.03% YTD performance, and -$80M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QEFA and GSID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QEFA vs GSID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QEFA GSID | -5.30%-5.31% | +4.09%+4.36% | +2.74%+3.03% | +20.97%+25.11% | +53.85%+58.79% | +50.99%+51.18% |
| Flows | QEFA GSID | -- | +$23M-$87M | +$23M-$80M | -$2M-$100M | -$212M+$218M | +$215M+$321M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QEFA GSID | +12.30%+14.35% | +14.35%+16.12% | +12.36%+13.78% | +13.41%+15.13% |
| Max drawdown | QEFA GSID | -7.00%-8.10% | -12.30%-14.37% | -12.30%-14.37% | -27.87%-29.33% |
| Max drawdown duration | QEFA GSID | 11d10d | 38d42d | 38d42d | 892d897d |
QEFA | GSID | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $92.33 | $69.58 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $93.07 | $70.57 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QEFA | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QEFA | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $92.33 | $69.58 |
| 1D performance | -0.80% | -1.40% |
| AuM | $1.02 B | $907.97 M |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.25% |
QEFA | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series Index | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 616 | 841 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 4, 2014 | May 12, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QEFA and GSID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, QEFA is up 2.74% year-to-date (YTD), while GSID has returned 3.03%. That puts GSID better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QEFA or GSID?
Year-to-date, the QEFA ETF saw +$23M in flows, compared to -$80M for GSID.
Which ETF is more volatile: QEFA or GSID?
Over the past year, QEFA had a volatility of 14.35%, while GSID experienced 16.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: QEFA or GSID?
As of March 12, 2026, QEFA holds $1.02 B in assets under management (AUM), while GSID manages $907.97 M.
What sectors do the QEFA and GSID ETFs invest in?
QEFA leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, GSID focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the QEFA ETF and GSID ETF?
QEFA top holdings include ASML HOLDING, NOVARTIS and ROCHE. GSID holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: QEFA or GSID?
QEFA holds 651 securities with 20.2% of its assets in the top 15. GSID has 889 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.33%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
