Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QDVOvsQQHETF Comparison
HCM Defender 100 ETF
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. HCM Defender 100 ETF (QQH) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QDVO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.98% for QQH. QDVO is down -2.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$83M in YTD flows. QQH performs worse with -2.9% YTD performance, and +$16M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QDVO and QQH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QDVO vs QQH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QDVO QQH | -1.24%-0.96% | -2.51%-5.48% | -2.02%-2.90% | +26.03%+25.65% | n/a+110.01% | n/a+88.64% |
| Flows | QDVO QQH | +$31M- | +$131M+$39M | +$83M+$16M | +$594M+$24M | -+$133M | -+$297M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QDVO QQH | +11.55%+21.77% | +17.73%+22.75% | n/a+21.89% | n/a+22.11% |
| Max drawdown | QDVO QQH | -4.29%-7.92% | -12.44%-13.04% | n/a-24.86% | n/a-41.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | QDVO QQH | 43d41d | 45d49d | n/a238d | n/a878d |
QDVO | QQH | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.63 | $73.41 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $27.97 | $75.08 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QDVO | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QDVO | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.63 | $73.41 |
| 1D performance | -1.22% | -2.23% |
| AuM | $614.07 M | $675.81 M |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.98% |
QDVO | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Amplify ETFs | Howard Capital Management |
| Benchmark | - | HCM Defender 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 44 | 84 |
| Asset class | - | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 22, 2024 | October 10, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QDVO and QQH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QDVO is down -2.02% year-to-date (YTD), while QQH has lost -2.9%. That puts QDVO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QDVO or QQH?
Year-to-date, the QDVO ETF saw +$83M in flows, compared to +$16M for QQH.
Which ETF is more volatile: QDVO or QQH?
Over the past year, QDVO had a volatility of 17.73%, while QQH experienced 22.75%.
Which ETF is bigger: QDVO or QQH?
As of March 11, 2026, QDVO holds $614.07 M in assets under management (AUM), while QQH manages $675.81 M.
What sectors do the QDVO and QQH ETFs invest in?
QDVO leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QQH focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QDVO ETF and QQH ETF?
QDVO top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QQH holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QDVO or QQH?
QDVO holds 46 securities with 67.22% of its assets in the top 15. QQH has 88 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.27%.
Amplify ETFs Unveils New Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) on NYSE Arca
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
