Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QDVOvsQBETF Comparison
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF (QB) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QDVO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.58% for QB. QDVO is down -2.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$83M in YTD flows. QB performs better with 2.35% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QDVO and QB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QDVO vs QB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QDVO QB | -1.24%+0.77% | -2.51%+2.58% | -2.02%+2.35% | +26.03%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | QDVO QB | +$31M- | +$131M- | +$83M- | +$594M- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QDVO QB | +11.55%+5.50% | +17.73%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QDVO QB | -4.29%-1.10% | -12.44%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QDVO QB | 43d10d | 45dn/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
QDVO | QB | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 5:03 PM | $27.69 | $43.30 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $27.97 | $43.29 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QDVO | QB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QDVO | QB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.69 | $43.30 |
| 1D performance | -1.00% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $614.07 M | $1.30 M |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.58% |
QDVO | QB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Amplify ETFs | ProShares |
| Benchmark | - | Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer Index |
| N° of holdings | 44 | 93 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 22, 2024 | June 24, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QDVO and QB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QDVO is down -2.02% year-to-date (YTD), while QB has returned 2.35%. That puts QB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QDVO or QB?
Year-to-date, the QDVO ETF saw +$83M in flows, compared to - for QB.
Which ETF is bigger: QDVO or QB?
As of March 11, 2026, QDVO holds $614.07 M in assets under management (AUM), while QB manages $1.30 M.
What sectors do the QDVO and QB ETFs invest in?
QDVO leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QB focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QDVO ETF and QB ETF?
QDVO top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QB holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QDVO or QB?
QDVO holds 46 securities with 67.22% of its assets in the top 15. QB has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.64%.
Amplify ETFs Unveils New Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) on NYSE Arca
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
