QCLRvsQHDGETF Comparison
Global X Nasdaq 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF (QHDG) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QCLR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.79% for QHDG. QCLR is up 1.53% year-to-date (YTD) with +$860K in YTD flows. QHDG performs worse with 1.35% YTD performance, and +$5K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QCLR and QHDG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QCLR vs QHDG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QCLR QHDG | +0.87%+0.65% | +4.70%+2.91% | +1.53%+1.35% | +10.58%+11.31% | +47.09%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | QCLR QHDG | -- | -+$5K | +$860K+$5K | +$2M-$7M | +$829K- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QCLR QHDG | +8.83%+5.97% | +9.82%+8.79% | +11.82%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QCLR QHDG | -5.43%-3.79% | -10.26%-6.94% | -13.20%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QCLR QHDG | 27d27d | 226d135d | 127dn/a | n/an/a |
QCLR | QHDG | |
Last sale 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.82 | $30.20 |
| Previous close 06/11/2026 | $28.80 | $30.18 |
| Consolidated volume 06/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QCLR | QHDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QCLR | QHDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.82 | $30.20 |
| 1D performance | +0.07% | +0.07% |
| AuM | $4.04 M | $3.02 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.79% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15