Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QCLRvsQBETF Comparison
Global X Nasdaq 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF (QB) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QCLR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.58% for QB. QCLR is down -1.75% year-to-date (YTD) with +$860K in YTD flows. QB performs better with 2.35% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QCLR and QB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QCLR vs QB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QCLR QB | -1.47%+0.77% | -3.50%+2.58% | -1.75%+2.35% | +15.61%n/a | +58.58%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | QCLR QB | -- | +$860K- | +$860K- | +$2M- | +$829K- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QCLR QB | +11.57%+5.50% | +11.56%n/a | +11.88%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QCLR QB | -4.14%-1.10% | -6.50%n/a | -13.20%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QCLR QB | 42d10d | 45dn/a | 127dn/a | n/an/a |
QCLR | QB | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 2:00 PM | $28.12 | $43.30 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $27.92 | $43.29 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QCLR | QB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QCLR | QB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.12 | $43.30 |
| 1D performance | +0.71% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $3.91 M | $1.30 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.58% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QCLR and QB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QCLR is down -1.75% year-to-date (YTD), while QB has returned 2.35%. That puts QB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QCLR or QB?
Year-to-date, the QCLR ETF saw +$860K in flows, compared to - for QB.
Which ETF is bigger: QCLR or QB?
As of March 11, 2026, QCLR holds $3.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while QB manages $1.30 M.
What sectors do the QCLR and QB ETFs invest in?
QCLR leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QB focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QCLR ETF and QB ETF?
QCLR top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QB holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QCLR or QB?
QCLR holds 99 securities with 58.08% of its assets in the top 15. QB has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.64%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
