QCLRvsQBETF Comparison
Global X Nasdaq 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF (QB) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QCLR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.58% for QB. QCLR is up 1.49% year-to-date (YTD) with +$860K in YTD flows. QB performs better with 8.35% YTD performance, and +$926K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QCLR and QB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QCLR vs QB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QCLR QB | +0.79%-0.95% | +3.29%+5.86% | +1.49%+8.35% | +10.62%n/a | +47.02%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | QCLR QB | -+$926K | -+$926K | +$860K+$926K | +$2M- | +$829K- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QCLR QB | +9.24%+9.47% | +9.82%n/a | +11.83%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QCLR QB | -6.49%-3.60% | -10.26%n/a | -13.20%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QCLR QB | 35d14d | 225dn/a | 127dn/a | n/an/a |
QCLR | QB | |
Last sale 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.82 | $45.97 |
| Previous close 06/11/2026 | $28.80 | $45.79 |
| Consolidated volume 06/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QCLR | QB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QCLR | QB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.82 | $45.97 |
| 1D performance | +0.07% | +0.38% |
| AuM | $4.04 M | $2.29 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.58% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15