Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QCLRvsGPIQETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
Global X Nasdaq 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QCLR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.35% for GPIQ. QCLR is down -3.03% year-to-date (YTD) with +$860K in YTD flows. GPIQ performs better with 0.34% YTD performance, and +$602M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QCLR and GPIQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QCLR vs GPIQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QCLR GPIQ | -1.48%-0.34% | -2.94%-0.68% | -3.03%+0.34% | +13.55%+28.63% | +56.51%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | QCLR GPIQ | -+$137M | +$860K+$807M | +$860K+$602M | +$2M+$2.54B | +$829K- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QCLR GPIQ | +11.24%+14.22% | +11.64%+20.59% | +11.90%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QCLR GPIQ | -5.02%-4.79% | -6.50%-14.95% | -13.20%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QCLR GPIQ | 43d42d | 45d45d | 127dn/a | n/an/a |
QCLR | GPIQ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 2:48 PM | $27.47 | $50.86 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $27.53 | $50.88 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QCLR | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QCLR | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.47 | $50.86 |
| 1D performance | -0.20% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $3.86 M | $3.10 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.35% |
QCLR | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Global X | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 93 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 25, 2021 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QCLR and GPIQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, QCLR is down -3.03% year-to-date (YTD), while GPIQ has returned 0.34%. That puts GPIQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QCLR or GPIQ?
Year-to-date, the QCLR ETF saw +$860K in flows, compared to +$602M for GPIQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: QCLR or GPIQ?
Over the past year, QCLR had a volatility of 11.64%, while GPIQ experienced 20.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: QCLR or GPIQ?
As of March 12, 2026, QCLR holds $3.86 M in assets under management (AUM), while GPIQ manages $3.10 B.
What sectors do the QCLR and GPIQ ETFs invest in?
QCLR leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GPIQ focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QCLR ETF and GPIQ ETF?
QCLR top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. GPIQ holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QCLR or GPIQ?
QCLR holds 99 securities with 58.08% of its assets in the top 15. GPIQ has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.81%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
