QCLNvsPBWETF Comparison
ETF 1
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF
This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
-2.56%
VS
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF (QCLN) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. QCLN's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, PBW's top sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Consumer Cyclicals. QCLN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.64% for PBW. QCLN is up 13.34% year-to-date (YTD) with -$15M in YTD flows. PBW performs worse with 4.62% YTD performance, and -$307M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QCLN and PBW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QCLN vs PBW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QCLN PBW | +1.59%+2.26% | -23.70%-30.22% | +13.34%+4.62% | +32.43%+25.49% | +12.15%-5.92% | -22.43%-56.01% |
| Flows | QCLN PBW | -$42M-$3M | -$106M-$6M | -$15M-$307M | -$10M-$80M | -$615M-$129M | -$1.10B-$412M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QCLN PBW | +50.13%+48.92% | +40.96%+43.82% | +37.56%+41.50% | +39.27%+43.41% |
| Max drawdown | QCLN PBW | -32.10%-36.09% | -32.10%-36.09% | -48.05%-62.30% | -69.47%-84.50% |
| Max drawdown duration | QCLN PBW | 86d87d | 86d87d | 771d777d | 1753d1754d |
Trading data
QCLN | PBW | |
Last sale 8/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.89 | $31.81 |
| Previous close 08/27/2026 | $50.55 | $32.86 |
| Consolidated volume 08/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QCLN | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QCLN | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.89 | $31.81 |
| 1D performance | -3.28% | -3.20% |
| AuM | $576.01 M | $384.79 M |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.64% |
Characteristics
QCLN | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Invesco |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index | WilderHill Clean Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 51 | 70 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 8, 2007 | March 3, 2005 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QCLN
USA
91.75%
Other
8.25%
PBW
USA
72.64%
Other
27.36%
Sectors
QCLN
Industrials
30.9%
Technology
30.05%
Consumer Cyclical.
14.63%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.25%
Utilities
9.24%
Other
3.93%
PBW
Industrials
40.47%
Non-Energy Materi.
22.94%
Consumer Cyclical.
11.97%
Technology
10.06%
Other
14.56%
Advertisement
Diversification
QCLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
74.15%
PBW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.06%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
QCLN
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
8.87%
Tesla, Inc.
8.40%
Bloom Energy Corp.
7.53%
First Solar, Inc.
7.40%
ON Semiconductor Corp.
6.57%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
5.93%
Albemarle Corp.
4.03%
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
4.02%
Acuity, Inc.
3.74%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
3.60%
MP Materials Corp.
3.54%
Nextpower, Inc.
2.98%
Vicor Corp.
2.54%
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.
2.50%
EnerSys
2.50%
PBW
Itron, Inc.
2.40%
Gentherm, Inc.
2.39%
OPAL Fuels, Inc.
2.27%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
2.17%
BETA Technologies, Inc.
2.12%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
2.07%
AXIA Energia SA
2.01%
Gevo, Inc.
2.01%
Cadeler A/S
1.92%
REX American Resources Corp.
1.89%
XPeng, Inc.
1.88%
NIO, Inc.
1.81%
Canadian Solar, Inc.
1.77%
Universal Display Corp.
1.68%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
1.68%
Frequently asked questions about QCLN and PBW
How have the QCLN and PBW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 27, 2026, QCLN is up 13.34% year-to-date (YTD), while PBW has returned 4.62%. That puts QCLN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QCLN or PBW?
Year-to-date, the QCLN ETF saw -$15M in flows, compared to -$307M for PBW.
Which ETF is more volatile: QCLN or PBW?
Over the past year, QCLN had a volatility of 40.96%, while PBW experienced 43.82%.
Which ETF is bigger: QCLN or PBW?
As of August 27, 2026, QCLN holds $576.01 M in assets under management (AUM), while PBW manages $384.79 M.
What sectors do the QCLN and PBW ETFs invest in?
QCLN leans toward sectors like Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals. Meanwhile, PBW focuses on Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Consumer Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the QCLN ETF and PBW ETF?
QCLN top holdings include Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., Tesla, Inc. and Bloom Energy Corp.. PBW holds in its top three: Itron, Inc., Gentherm, Inc. and OPAL Fuels, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QCLN or PBW?
QCLN holds 51 securities with 74.15% of its assets in the top 15. PBW has 72 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.06%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QCLN & PBW
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
QCLN
PBW
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
QCLN
PBW
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
August 21, 2023
PBW
Advertisement
Advertisement
