QCLNvsPBWETF Comparison
ETF 1
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF
This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
-0.64%
VS
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF (QCLN) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. QCLN's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, PBW's top sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. QCLN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.64% for PBW. QCLN is up 17.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$51M in YTD flows. PBW performs worse with 9.9% YTD performance, and -$285M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QCLN and PBW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QCLN vs PBW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QCLN PBW | -15.37%-15.82% | -2.02%-6.13% | +17.02%+9.90% | +49.68%+43.31% | -5.96%-18.84% | -13.98%-52.62% |
| Flows | QCLN PBW | -$57M-$43M | +$70M+$16M | +$51M-$285M | +$44M-$48M | -$595M-$135M | -$1.09B-$408M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QCLN PBW | +51.81%+49.96% | +39.74%+42.64% | +37.15%+41.05% | +39.23%+43.31% |
| Max drawdown | QCLN PBW | -23.76%-28.53% | -23.76%-28.53% | -56.02%-68.02% | -69.47%-84.50% |
| Max drawdown duration | QCLN PBW | 44d45d | 44d45d | 1008d1025d | 1711d1712d |
Trading data
QCLN | PBW | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $52.24 | $33.39 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $52.19 | $33.43 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QCLN | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QCLN | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $52.24 | $33.39 |
| 1D performance | +0.10% | -0.12% |
| AuM | $662.50 M | $423.59 M |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.64% |
Characteristics
QCLN | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Invesco |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index | WilderHill Clean Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 51 | 68 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 8, 2007 | March 3, 2005 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QCLN
USA
92.08%
Other
7.92%
PBW
USA
79.12%
Other
20.88%
Sectors
QCLN
Industrials
35.44%
Technology
33.75%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.45%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.39%
Utilities
8.47%
Other
3.5%
PBW
Industrials
48.82%
Non-Energy Materi.
20.57%
Technology
14.28%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.31%
Other
9.02%
Advertisement
Diversification
QCLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.98%
PBW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
QCLN
ON Semiconductor Corp.
10.66%
Bloom Energy Corp.
10.29%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
7.91%
First Solar, Inc.
7.71%
Tesla, Inc.
6.05%
Nextpower, Inc.
4.04%
MP Materials Corp.
3.37%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
3.24%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
3.09%
Vicor Corp.
2.97%
Albemarle Corp.
2.81%
Acuity, Inc.
2.58%
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
2.57%
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.
2.39%
EnerSys
2.30%
PBW
Hyliion Holdings Corp.
3.92%
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
3.76%
Navitas Semiconductor Corp.
3.21%
Ballard Power Systems, Inc.
2.50%
IonQ, Inc.
2.13%
Bloom Energy Corp.
2.08%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
2.02%
Aspen Aerogels, Inc.
2.02%
D-Wave Quantum, Inc.
1.81%
Plug Power, Inc.
1.80%
MYR Group, Inc.
1.80%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
1.72%
Lithium Argentina AG
1.71%
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.
1.69%
American Superconductor Corp.
1.67%
Frequently asked questions about QCLN and PBW
How have the QCLN and PBW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 16, 2026, QCLN is up 17.02% year-to-date (YTD), while PBW has returned 9.9%. That puts QCLN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QCLN or PBW?
Year-to-date, the QCLN ETF saw +$51M in flows, compared to -$285M for PBW.
Which ETF is more volatile: QCLN or PBW?
Over the past year, QCLN had a volatility of 39.74%, while PBW experienced 42.64%.
Which ETF is bigger: QCLN or PBW?
As of July 16, 2026, QCLN holds $662.50 M in assets under management (AUM), while PBW manages $423.59 M.
What sectors do the QCLN and PBW ETFs invest in?
QCLN leans toward sectors like Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals. Meanwhile, PBW focuses on Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the QCLN ETF and PBW ETF?
QCLN top holdings include ON Semiconductor Corp., Bloom Energy Corp. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. PBW holds in its top three: Hyliion Holdings Corp., FuelCell Energy, Inc. and Navitas Semiconductor Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: QCLN or PBW?
QCLN holds 51 securities with 71.98% of its assets in the top 15. PBW has 68 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.84%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QCLN & PBW
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
QCLN
PBW
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
QCLN
PBW
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
August 21, 2023
PBW
Advertisement
Advertisement
