QCLNvsFITEETF Comparison
ETF 1
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF
This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
-0.56%
VS
ETF 2
FITE
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF (QCLN) belongs to the Alternative Energy segment. State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) is part of the segment. QCLN's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, FITE's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Telecommunications. QCLN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.45% for FITE. QCLN is up 13.5% year-to-date (YTD) with -$10M in YTD flows. FITE performs better with 25.09% YTD performance, and +$26M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QCLN and FITE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QCLN vs FITE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/08/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QCLN FITE | -2.78%-8.71% | -17.76%-0.08% | +13.50%+25.09% | +34.08%+32.62% | +12.48%+121.16% | -21.25%+104.91% |
| Flows | QCLN FITE | -$15M+$1M | -$124M+$3M | -$10M+$26M | -$7M+$30M | -$600M+$52M | -$1.10B+$63M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QCLN FITE | +46.80%+29.31% | +41.05%+28.18% | +37.56%+23.51% | +39.30%+23.33% |
| Max drawdown | QCLN FITE | -28.86%-10.84% | -32.10%-15.26% | -47.01%-21.91% | -69.47%-27.21% |
| Max drawdown duration | QCLN FITE | 78d27d | 98d98d | 761d116d | 1765d809d |
Trading data
QCLN | FITE | |
Last sale 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.52 | $106.16 |
| Previous close 09/09/2026 | $49.35 | $106.70 |
| Consolidated volume 09/09/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QCLN | FITE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QCLN | FITE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.52 | $106.16 |
| 1D performance | -1.68% | -0.51% |
| AuM | $581.89 M | $143.96 M |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.45% |
Characteristics
QCLN | FITE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index | S&P Kensho Future Security Index |
| N° of holdings | 51 | 78 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 8, 2007 | December 26, 2017 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QCLN
USA
91.75%
Other
8.25%
FITE
USA
91.39%
Other
8.61%
Sectors
QCLN
Industrials
30.9%
Technology
30.05%
Consumer Cyclical.
14.63%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.25%
Utilities
9.24%
Other
3.93%
FITE
Technology
53.02%
Industrials
38.23%
Other
8.74%
Advertisement
Diversification
QCLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
74.15%
FITE
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.47%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
QCLN
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
8.87%
Tesla, Inc.
8.40%
Bloom Energy Corp.
7.53%
First Solar, Inc.
7.40%
ON Semiconductor Corp.
6.57%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
5.93%
Albemarle Corp.
4.03%
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
4.02%
Acuity, Inc.
3.74%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
3.60%
MP Materials Corp.
3.54%
Nextpower, Inc.
2.98%
Vicor Corp.
2.54%
EnerSys
2.50%
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.
2.50%
FITE
N-able, Inc.
2.05%
Rapid7, Inc.
1.80%
Qualys, Inc.
1.77%
SentinelOne, Inc.
1.73%
Cloudflare, Inc.
1.71%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
1.70%
ViaSat, Inc.
1.68%
Oceaneering International, Inc.
1.67%
Okta, Inc.
1.66%
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
1.64%
Varonis Systems, Inc.
1.63%
RTX Corp.
1.63%
Zscaler, Inc.
1.63%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
1.59%
Datadog, Inc.
1.58%
Frequently asked questions about QCLN and FITE
How have the QCLN and FITE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 8, 2026, QCLN is up 13.5% year-to-date (YTD), while FITE has returned 25.09%. That puts FITE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QCLN or FITE?
Year-to-date, the QCLN ETF saw -$10M in flows, compared to +$26M for FITE.
Which ETF is more volatile: QCLN or FITE?
Over the past year, QCLN had a volatility of 41.05%, while FITE experienced 28.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: QCLN or FITE?
As of September 8, 2026, QCLN holds $581.89 M in assets under management (AUM), while FITE manages $143.96 M.
What sectors do the QCLN and FITE ETFs invest in?
QCLN leans toward sectors like Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals. Meanwhile, FITE focuses on Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the QCLN ETF and FITE ETF?
QCLN top holdings include Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., Tesla, Inc. and Bloom Energy Corp.. FITE holds in its top three: N-able, Inc., Rapid7, Inc. and Qualys, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QCLN or FITE?
QCLN holds 51 securities with 74.15% of its assets in the top 15. FITE has 78 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.47%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QCLN & FITE
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
QCLN
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
QCLN
Advertisement
Advertisement
