QCLNvsFADETF Comparison
ETF 1
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF
This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
-0.59%
VS
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF (QCLN) belongs to the Alternative Energy segment. First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund ETF (FAD) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. QCLN's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, FAD's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. QCLN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.63% for FAD. QCLN is down -2.85% year-to-date (YTD) with -$41M in YTD flows. FAD performs better with 9.23% YTD performance, and +$190M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QCLN and FAD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QCLN vs FAD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/22/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QCLN FAD | -13.13%-4.22% | -18.05%-5.10% | -2.85%+9.23% | -1.83%+10.35% | +21.93%+86.97% | -35.95%+44.27% |
| Flows | QCLN FAD | -$26M+$9M | -$68M+$55M | -$41M+$190M | -$42M+$206M | -$614M+$290M | -$1.08B+$245M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QCLN FAD | +36.66%+18.31% | +41.25%+20.79% | +37.54%+20.03% | +39.49%+21.48% |
| Max drawdown | QCLN FAD | -18.90%-9.76% | -36.71%-12.44% | -42.86%-23.51% | -69.47%-31.99% |
| Max drawdown duration | QCLN FAD | 67d66d | 142d114d | 644d230d | 1809d967d |
Trading data
QCLN | FAD | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $42.58 | $176.17 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $43.32 | $176.58 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QCLN | FAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QCLN | FAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.58 | $176.17 |
| 1D performance | -1.71% | -0.23% |
| AuM | $469.89 M | $591.50 M |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.63% |
Characteristics
QCLN | FAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | First Trust |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index | NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 51 | 666 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 8, 2007 | May 8, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QCLN
USA
91.71%
Other
8.29%
FAD
USA
96.36%
Other
3.64%
Sectors
QCLN
Industrials
31.02%
Technology
29.04%
Consumer Cyclical.
15.22%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.63%
Utilities
9.21%
Other
3.88%
FAD
Technology
23.97%
Industrials
19.43%
Healthcare
18%
Finance
14.62%
Other
23.98%
Advertisement
Diversification
QCLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
74.62%
FAD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.11%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
QCLN
Tesla, Inc.
8.97%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
8.59%
Bloom Energy Corp.
8.23%
First Solar, Inc.
7.14%
ON Semiconductor Corp.
6.61%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
5.96%
Albemarle Corp.
4.22%
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
3.79%
Acuity, Inc.
3.69%
MP Materials Corp.
3.57%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
3.54%
Nextpower, Inc.
2.91%
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.
2.47%
EnerSys
2.47%
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
2.46%
FAD
Incyte Corp.
0.54%
Fortinet, Inc.
0.51%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
0.51%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
0.50%
Morgan Stanley
0.49%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
0.48%
Everpure, Inc.
0.47%
Illumina, Inc.
0.46%
eBay, Inc.
0.46%
Natera, Inc.
0.46%
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
0.45%
Cincinnati Financial Corp.
0.45%
Amphenol Corp.
0.45%
Arista Networks, Inc.
0.44%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
0.44%
Frequently asked questions about QCLN and FAD
How have the QCLN and FAD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 22, 2026, QCLN is down -2.85% year-to-date (YTD), while FAD has returned 9.23%. That puts FAD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QCLN or FAD?
Year-to-date, the QCLN ETF saw -$41M in flows, compared to +$190M for FAD.
Which ETF is more volatile: QCLN or FAD?
Over the past year, QCLN had a volatility of 41.25%, while FAD experienced 20.79%.
Which ETF is bigger: QCLN or FAD?
As of October 22, 2026, QCLN holds $469.89 M in assets under management (AUM), while FAD manages $591.50 M.
What sectors do the QCLN and FAD ETFs invest in?
QCLN leans toward sectors like Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals. Meanwhile, FAD focuses on Technology, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the QCLN ETF and FAD ETF?
QCLN top holdings include Tesla, Inc., Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Bloom Energy Corp.. FAD holds in its top three: Incyte Corp., Fortinet, Inc. and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QCLN or FAD?
QCLN holds 51 securities with 74.62% of its assets in the top 15. FAD has 666 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.11%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QCLN & FAD
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
QCLN
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
QCLN
Advertisement
Advertisement
