QCLNvsARWGETF Comparison
ETF 1
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF
This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
-2.33%
VS
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF (QCLN) belongs to the Alternative Energy segment. Archer Growth ETF (ARWG) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. QCLN's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, ARWG's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Energy. QCLN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.85% for ARWG. QCLN is up 15.87% year-to-date (YTD) with +$27M in YTD flows. ARWG performs worse with 4.28% YTD performance, and +$10M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QCLN and ARWG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QCLN vs ARWG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QCLN ARWG | -15.62%-1.13% | -9.53%+3.77% | +15.87%+4.28% | +39.98%n/a | -2.83%n/a | -17.93%n/a |
| Flows | QCLN ARWG | -$81M+$786K | +$44M+$1M | +$27M+$10M | +$23M- | -$633M- | -$1.09B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QCLN ARWG | +52.20%+24.17% | +39.84%n/a | +37.20%n/a | +39.20%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QCLN ARWG | -25.10%-7.30% | -25.10%n/a | -54.60%n/a | -69.47%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QCLN ARWG | 51d15d | 51dn/a | 991dn/a | 1718dn/a |
Trading data
QCLN | ARWG | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.26 | $25.51 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $51.60 | $25.37 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ARWG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexQCLN | ARWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QCLN | ARWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.26 | $25.51 |
| 1D performance | -4.53% | +0.55% |
| AuM | $632.79 M | $13.77 M |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.85% |
Characteristics
QCLN | ARWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | Archer funds |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 51 | 40 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 8, 2007 | December 30, 2025 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QCLN
USA
91.85%
Other
8.15%
ARWG
USA
97.54%
Other
2.46%
Sectors
QCLN
Industrials
32.39%
Technology
32.32%
Consumer Cyclical.
13.81%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.45%
Utilities
8.23%
Other
3.8%
ARWG
Technology
50.69%
Industrials
20.37%
Energy
9.68%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.64%
Other
9.62%
Advertisement
Diversification
QCLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.9%
ARWG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.49%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
QCLN
Bloom Energy Corp.
9.07%
Tesla, Inc.
8.72%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
7.60%
ON Semiconductor Corp.
7.01%
First Solar, Inc.
6.76%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
4.71%
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
4.12%
Vicor Corp.
3.61%
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.
3.58%
Albemarle Corp.
3.45%
Acuity, Inc.
3.39%
Nextpower, Inc.
3.32%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
3.17%
MP Materials Corp.
2.94%
EnerSys
2.45%
ARWG
RXO, Inc.
3.31%
Sandisk Corp.
3.13%
Lam Research Corp.
3.07%
MKS, Inc.
3.04%
Axon Enterprise, Inc.
2.82%
Freshworks, Inc.
2.72%
Silicon Motion Technology Corp.
2.71%
Western Digital Corp.
2.71%
Unity Software, Inc.
2.62%
Block, Inc.
2.62%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
2.58%
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
2.58%
Datadog, Inc.
2.56%
SentinelOne, Inc.
2.52%
UiPath, Inc.
2.50%
Frequently asked questions about QCLN and ARWG
How have the QCLN and ARWG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 23, 2026, QCLN is up 15.87% year-to-date (YTD), while ARWG has returned 4.28%. That puts QCLN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QCLN or ARWG?
Year-to-date, the QCLN ETF saw +$27M in flows, compared to +$10M for ARWG.
Which ETF is bigger: QCLN or ARWG?
As of July 23, 2026, QCLN holds $632.79 M in assets under management (AUM), while ARWG manages $13.77 M.
What sectors do the QCLN and ARWG ETFs invest in?
QCLN leans toward sectors like Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals. Meanwhile, ARWG focuses on Technology, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the QCLN ETF and ARWG ETF?
QCLN top holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., Tesla, Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. ARWG holds in its top three: RXO, Inc., Sandisk Corp. and Lam Research Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: QCLN or ARWG?
QCLN holds 51 securities with 73.9% of its assets in the top 15. ARWG has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.49%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QCLN & ARWG
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
QCLN
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
QCLN
Advertisement
Advertisement
