Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QBvsQYLGETF Comparison
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF (QB) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.35% for QYLG. QB is up 2.34% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. QYLG performs worse with 0.41% YTD performance, and +$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QB and QYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QB vs QYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QB QYLG | +0.82%-0.03% | +2.30%+0.12% | +2.34%+0.41% | n/a+24.35% | n/a+84.07% | n/a+72.03% |
| Flows | QB QYLG | --$264K | -+$20M | -+$8M | -+$38M | -+$62M | -+$137M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QB QYLG | +5.53%+12.73% | n/a+19.26% | n/a+15.92% | n/a+18.63% |
| Max drawdown | QB QYLG | -1.26%-4.33% | n/a-13.82% | n/a-20.90% | n/a-30.00% |
| Max drawdown duration | QB QYLG | 8d41d | n/a45d | n/a155d | n/a718d |
QB | QYLG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.30 | $27.06 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $43.29 | $27.02 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QB | QYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QB | QYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.30 | $27.06 |
| 1D performance | +0.02% | +0.15% |
| AuM | $1.30 M | $137.41 M |
| E/R | 0.58% | 0.35% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QB and QYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, QB is up 2.34% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLG has returned 0.41%. That puts QB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QB or QYLG?
Year-to-date, the QB ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$8M for QYLG.
Which ETF is bigger: QB or QYLG?
As of March 10, 2026, QB holds $1.30 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLG manages $137.41 M.
What sectors do the QB and QYLG ETFs invest in?
QB leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QYLG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QB ETF and QYLG ETF?
QB top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QYLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QB or QYLG?
QB holds 99 securities with 58.64% of its assets in the top 15. QYLG has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.14%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
