Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QARPvsRECSETF Comparison
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QARP's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. In contrast, RECS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. QARP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.15% for RECS. QARP is up 2.99% year-to-date (YTD) with -$12M in YTD flows. RECS performs worse with -1.35% YTD performance, and +$271M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QARP and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QARP vs RECS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QARP RECS | -1.92%-3.13% | +2.92%-0.98% | +2.99%-1.35% | +18.54%+22.37% | +70.41%+79.91% | +79.83%+99.42% |
| Flows | QARP RECS | -$9M+$185M | -$12M+$488M | -$12M+$271M | +$31K+$2.27B | +$33M+$4.22B | -$6M+$4.19B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QARP RECS | +9.75%+11.79% | +15.73%+18.03% | +12.84%+14.51% | +15.55%+16.56% |
| Max drawdown | QARP RECS | -3.05%-3.59% | -11.48%-13.84% | -15.60%-18.49% | -22.70%-22.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | QARP RECS | 13d28d | 45d45d | 155d126d | 572d573d |
QARP | RECS | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $60.71 | $40.10 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $60.75 | $40.11 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QARP | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QARP | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $60.71 | $40.10 |
| 1D performance | -0.06% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $71.43 M | $4.97 B |
| E/R | 0.19% | 0.15% |
QARP | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 914 | 331 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 15, 2018 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QARP and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, QARP is up 2.99% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has lost -1.35%. That puts QARP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QARP or RECS?
Year-to-date, the QARP ETF saw -$12M in flows, compared to +$271M for RECS.
Which ETF is more volatile: QARP or RECS?
Over the past year, QARP had a volatility of 15.73%, while RECS experienced 18.03%.
Which ETF is bigger: QARP or RECS?
As of March 10, 2026, QARP holds $71.43 M in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $4.97 B.
What sectors do the QARP and RECS ETFs invest in?
QARP leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QARP ETF and RECS ETF?
QARP top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and AMAZON.COM INC. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QARP or RECS?
QARP holds 1008 securities with 47.72% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 336 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.28%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.