QARPvsLCTUETF Comparison
ETF 1
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
+0.14%
VS
ETF 2
LCTU
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) is part of the segment. QARP's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. In contrast, LCTU's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. QARP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.3% for LCTU. QARP is up 12.13% year-to-date (YTD) with -$14M in YTD flows. LCTU performs worse with 7.86% YTD performance, and -$327M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QARP and LCTU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QARP vs LCTU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QARP LCTU | +2.00%+1.06% | +4.30%+4.15% | +12.13%+7.86% | +21.63%+16.30% | +59.02%+64.53% | +72.73%+69.50% |
| Flows | QARP LCTU | --$277M | -$3M-$300M | -$14M-$327M | -$7M-$312M | +$15M-$1.06B | +$224K-$841M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QARP LCTU | +10.04%+12.73% | +10.62%+12.85% | +12.80%+15.29% | +15.53%+17.35% |
| Max drawdown | QARP LCTU | -2.71%-4.38% | -7.32%-9.37% | -15.60%-19.80% | -22.70%-25.94% |
| Max drawdown duration | QARP LCTU | 15d37d | 50d93d | 155d127d | 572d744d |
Trading data
QARP | LCTU | |
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $65.82 | $79.59 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $65.40 | $79.44 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LCTU
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexQARP | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QARP | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.82 | $79.59 |
| 1D performance | +0.64% | +0.19% |
| AuM | $75.73 M | $1.20 B |
| E/R | 0.19% | 0.3% |
Characteristics
QARP | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | iShares |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1008 | 312 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 16, 2018 | April 8, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QARP
USA
98.23%
Other
1.77%
LCTU
USA
98.25%
Other
1.75%
Sectors
QARP
Technology
35.22%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
16.58%
Healthcare
11.26%
Finance
10%
Industrials
8.91%
Other
18.02%
LCTU
Technology
43.75%
Finance
13.62%
Healthcare
8.69%
Industrials
8.43%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.32%
Other
17.19%
Advertisement
Diversification
QARP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.99%
LCTU
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.87%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
QARP
Apple, Inc.
6.04%
NVIDIA Corp.
5.71%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.50%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.33%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
4.15%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.60%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.29%
Walmart, Inc.
2.91%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.41%
Johnson & Johnson
2.37%
Chevron Corp.
2.10%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
1.88%
Visa, Inc.
1.67%
Lam Research Corp.
1.66%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.38%
LCTU
NVIDIA Corp.
7.30%
Apple, Inc.
6.73%
Microsoft Corp.
3.44%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.85%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.81%
Broadcom Inc.
2.34%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.19%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.90%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.78%
Tesla, Inc.
1.73%
Bank of America Corp.
1.54%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.49%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.35%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.27%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.15%
Frequently asked questions about QARP and LCTU
How have the QARP and LCTU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 27, 2026, QARP is up 12.13% year-to-date (YTD), while LCTU has returned 7.86%. That puts QARP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QARP or LCTU?
Year-to-date, the QARP ETF saw -$14M in flows, compared to -$327M for LCTU.
Which ETF is more volatile: QARP or LCTU?
Over the past year, QARP had a volatility of 10.62%, while LCTU experienced 12.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: QARP or LCTU?
As of July 27, 2026, QARP holds $75.73 M in assets under management (AUM), while LCTU manages $1.20 B.
What sectors do the QARP and LCTU ETFs invest in?
QARP leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. Meanwhile, LCTU focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the QARP ETF and LCTU ETF?
QARP top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Amazon.com, Inc.. LCTU holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: QARP or LCTU?
QARP holds 1026 securities with 47.99% of its assets in the top 15. LCTU has 315 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.87%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QARP & LCTU
Advertisement
