Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QARPvsDFVXETF Comparison
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) is part of the US Large Cap segment. QARP's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. In contrast, DFVX's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Industrials. QARP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.22% for DFVX. QARP is up 2.99% year-to-date (YTD) with -$12M in YTD flows. DFVX performs better with 3% YTD performance, and +$12M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QARP and DFVX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QARP vs DFVX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QARP DFVX | -1.92%-2.47% | +2.92%+3.69% | +2.99%+3.00% | +18.54%+19.69% | +70.41%n/a | +79.83%n/a |
| Flows | QARP DFVX | -$9M+$8M | -$12M+$12M | -$12M+$12M | +$31K-$12M | +$33M- | -$6M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QARP DFVX | +9.75%+10.76% | +15.73%+16.59% | +12.84%n/a | +15.55%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QARP DFVX | -3.05%-2.99% | -11.48%-12.45% | -15.60%n/a | -22.70%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QARP DFVX | 13d28d | 45d45d | 155dn/a | 572dn/a |
QARP | DFVX | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $60.71 | $76.31 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $60.75 | $76.36 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QARP | DFVX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QARP | DFVX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $60.71 | $76.31 |
| 1D performance | -0.06% | -0.07% |
| AuM | $71.43 M | $451.65 M |
| E/R | 0.19% | 0.22% |
QARP | DFVX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | Dimensional |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 914 | 309 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 15, 2018 | November 2, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QARP and DFVX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, QARP is up 2.99% year-to-date (YTD), while DFVX has returned 3%. That puts DFVX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QARP or DFVX?
Year-to-date, the QARP ETF saw -$12M in flows, compared to +$12M for DFVX.
Which ETF is more volatile: QARP or DFVX?
Over the past year, QARP had a volatility of 15.73%, while DFVX experienced 16.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: QARP or DFVX?
As of March 10, 2026, QARP holds $71.43 M in assets under management (AUM), while DFVX manages $451.65 M.
What sectors do the QARP and DFVX ETFs invest in?
QARP leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, DFVX focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the QARP ETF and DFVX ETF?
QARP top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and AMAZON.COM INC. DFVX holds in its top three: AMAZON.COM INC, MICROSOFT-T and META PLATFORMS.
Which ETF is more diversified: QARP or DFVX?
QARP holds 1008 securities with 47.72% of its assets in the top 15. DFVX has 321 securities and a top 15 weight of 37.52%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.