Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QABAvsFDIQETF Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund ETF
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund ETF (QABA) belongs to the US Financials segment. Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. QABA's top 3 sector exposures are Financials and Information Technology. In contrast, FDIQ's top sector exposures are Financials QABA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.62%, versus 0.35% for FDIQ. QABA is up 1.69% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. FDIQ performs better with 16.45% YTD performance, and -$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QABA and FDIQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QABA vs FDIQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QABA FDIQ | -8.68%+2.86% | -2.35%+13.04% | +1.69%+16.45% | +14.27%+34.69% | +31.90%+54.19% | +9.12%+29.12% |
| Flows | QABA FDIQ | --$1M | -$6M-$6M | -$6M-$4M | -$44M-$10M | -$62M-$19M | -$20M-$16M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QABA FDIQ | +23.47%+20.72% | +25.82%+27.30% | +28.99%+30.35% | +27.22%+28.78% |
| Max drawdown | QABA FDIQ | -10.09%-4.02% | -13.70%-15.72% | -25.72%-27.92% | -43.21%-43.08% |
| Max drawdown duration | QABA FDIQ | 30d17d | 46d46d | 421d421d | 1023d1023d |
QABA | FDIQ | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $57.03 | $70.97 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $57.57 | $72.14 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QABA | FDIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QABA | FDIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $57.03 | $70.97 |
| 1D performance | -0.94% | -1.62% |
| AuM | $74.82 M | $53.29 M |
| E/R | 0.62% | 0.35% |
QABA | FDIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Invesco |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ OMX ABA Community Bank Index | Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index |
| N° of holdings | 142 | 48 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 29, 2009 | November 1, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QABA and FDIQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, QABA is up 1.69% year-to-date (YTD), while FDIQ has returned 16.45%. That puts FDIQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QABA or FDIQ?
Year-to-date, the QABA ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to -$4M for FDIQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: QABA or FDIQ?
Over the past year, QABA had a volatility of 25.82%, while FDIQ experienced 27.3%.
Which ETF is bigger: QABA or FDIQ?
As of March 10, 2026, QABA holds $74.82 M in assets under management (AUM), while FDIQ manages $53.29 M.
What sectors do the QABA and FDIQ ETFs invest in?
QABA leans toward sectors like Financials. Meanwhile, FDIQ focuses on Financials.
What are the top holdings of the QABA ETF and FDIQ ETF?
QABA top holdings include WINTRUST FINCL, COMMERCE BANCSHARES and UNITED BANKSHRS. FDIQ holds in its top three: WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION, US84472E1029 and WINTRUST FINCL.
Which ETF is more diversified: QABA or FDIQ?
QABA holds 150 securities with 35.27% of its assets in the top 15. FDIQ has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.41%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
