Ready-made ETF portfolios built for real investor needs. Explore now →

Advertisement
Advertisement

PZTvsSMBETF Comparison

ETF 1
PZT

Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF

This fund is part of
Municipal Bonds
-0%
VS
ETF 2
SMB

VanEck Short Muni ETF

This fund is part of
Municipal Bonds
-0%

Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) and VanEck Short Muni ETF (SMB) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. PZT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.28%, versus 0.07% for SMB. PZT is down -5.78% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. SMB performs better with 0.17% YTD performance, and +$81M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PZT and SMB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

PZT vs SMB performance and flow charts

Performance

-3.0-2.0-1.00.0%Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14

Cumulative Flows

0 M10 M20 M30 M40 M50 M60 MSep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
PZT
SMB
-0.53%+0.03%
-6.24%-0.65%
-5.78%+0.17%
-5.69%+0.63%
+6.62%+9.84%
-7.53%+5.42%
Flows
PZT
SMB
-$1M+$57M
+$239K+$63M
+$6M+$81M
+$2M+$88M
+$52M+$125M
+$41M+$58M
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
PZT
SMB
+7.43%+2.25%
+4.89%+1.41%
+5.83%+1.43%
+5.75%+1.53%
Max drawdown
PZT
SMB
-8.98%-2.28%
-10.03%-2.49%
-10.03%-2.49%
-18.68%-6.38%
Max drawdown duration
PZT
SMB
92d64d
229d229d
229d229d
1747d995d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
PZT
SMB
Last sale
10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
$20.90
$17.10
Previous close
10/15/2026
$20.82
$17.18
Consolidated volume
10/15/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of October 18, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
PZT
SMB
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PZT
SMB
Last price
$20.90
$17.10
1D performance
+0.38%
-0.47%
AuM$130.87 M$371.23 M
E/R0.28%0.07%
Characteristics
PZT
SMB
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderInvescoVanEck
BenchmarkICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Municipal Securities IndexICE Short AMT-Free Broad National Municipal Index
N° of holdings767234
Asset classBonds-
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateOctober 11, 2007February 22, 2008
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

PZT
USA
69.78%
Other
30.22%
SMB
USA
72.14%
Other
27.86%

Sectors

PZT
Municipal
69.78%
Other
30.22%
SMB
Municipal
72.14%
Other
27.86%
Advertisement

Diversification

PZT

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

11.73%
SMB

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

13.24%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of August 31, 2026
PZT
New York Dormitory Authority, 5.5% 1jul2054, USD (2024A)
1.74%
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., 5% 15feb2042, USD
0.89%
New York Dormitory Authority, 4.25% 1may2052, USD (2022A)
0.87%
Battery Park City Authority, 5.25% 1nov2055, USD (2025)
0.80%
New York Power Authority, 4% 15nov2050, USD
0.78%
New York Dormitory Authority, 5.25% 1may2054, USD (2024A)
0.73%
New York Power Authority, 4% 15nov2055, USD
0.73%
US649519DW23
0.72%
Monroe Industrial Development Corp., 4% 1jul2050, USD (2020A)
0.69%
New York Liberty Development Corp., 2.45% 15sep2069, USD (2019)
0.68%
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., 4% 15feb2047, USD
0.66%
New York Dormitory Authority, 5% 1may2052, USD (2022A)
0.63%
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., 4% 15feb2044, USD
0.63%
New York Dormitory Authority, 5.5% 1oct2054, USD (2024)
0.60%
New York Power Authority, 4% 15nov2045, USD
0.60%
SMB
US64972LAF04
1.05%
US45506EMV29
1.03%
US160853VD67
1.03%
California, 5% 1apr2030, USD
1.03%
Southeast Energy Authority, 4% 1dec2051, USD
0.95%
Massachusetts, 5% 1may2031, USD
0.91%
US48542AFE64
0.90%
New Jersey, 2% 1jun2030, USD (2021)
0.90%
California, 5% 1oct2031, USD
0.89%
US64972KKJ33
0.85%
US13078HAY80
0.79%
Massachusetts, 5% 1oct2031, USD (2022)
0.79%
King, 4% 1jul2030, USD
0.72%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 4% 1oct2052, USD (2021)
0.72%
Connecticut, 3% 15jan2032, USD
0.70%
Frequently asked questions about PZT and SMB

How have the PZT and SMB ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 16, 2026, PZT is down -5.78% year-to-date (YTD), while SMB has returned 0.17%. That puts SMB better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PZT or SMB?

Year-to-date, the PZT ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to +$81M for SMB.

Which ETF is more volatile: PZT or SMB?

Over the past year, PZT had a volatility of 4.89%, while SMB experienced 1.41%.

Which ETF is bigger: PZT or SMB?

As of October 16, 2026, PZT holds $130.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMB manages $371.23 M.

What sectors do the PZT and SMB ETFs invest in?

PZT leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, SMB focuses on Municipal.

What are the top holdings of the PZT ETF and SMB ETF?

PZT top holdings include New York Dormitory Authority, 5.5% 1jul2054, USD (2024A), Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., 5% 15feb2042, USD and New York Dormitory Authority, 4.25% 1may2052, USD (2022A). SMB holds in its top three: US64972LAF04, US45506EMV29 and US160853VD67.

Which ETF is more diversified: PZT or SMB?

PZT holds 1312 securities with 11.73% of its assets in the top 15. SMB has 330 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.24%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
New Report

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection

With 1,790 new products launched by July 2026, choosing is harder than ever. Our Global ETF Survey 2026, built on 620 professional investors and allocators, shows how active, fixed income, options-based and thematic ETFs are reshaping fund selection.

Global ETF Survey 2026