Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PYvsRWLETF Comparison
Principal Value ETF (PY) belongs to the US Large Cap Value segment. Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) is part of the US Large Cap segment. PY's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, RWL's top sector exposures are Health Care, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. PY is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.39% for RWL. PY is up 0.23% year-to-date (YTD) with +$74M in YTD flows. RWL performs better with 2.38% YTD performance, and +$756M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PY and RWL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PY vs RWL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PY RWL | -2.65%-3.11% | -0.59%+1.42% | +0.23%+2.38% | +9.07%+21.58% | +43.06%+69.04% | +49.16%+84.57% |
| Flows | PY RWL | +$12M+$539M | +$77M+$867M | +$74M+$756M | -$114M+$2.12B | +$149M+$4.77B | +$180M+$5.44B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PY RWL | +10.24%+9.89% | +16.84%+15.36% | +14.05%+12.59% | +15.93%+14.59% |
| Max drawdown | PY RWL | -3.03%-3.21% | -13.47%-11.32% | -17.91%-14.07% | -18.43%-17.55% |
| Max drawdown duration | PY RWL | 30d10d | 95d46d | 263d127d | 695d468d |
PY | RWL | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $51.43 | $116.19 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $52.02 | $117.21 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PY | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PY | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.43 | $116.19 |
| 1D performance | -1.14% | -0.87% |
| AuM | $198.03 M | $8.21 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.39% |
PY | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Principal Global Investors | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index |
| N° of holdings | 97 | 479 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 21, 2016 | February 22, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PY and RWL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, PY is up 0.23% year-to-date (YTD), while RWL has returned 2.38%. That puts RWL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PY or RWL?
Year-to-date, the PY ETF saw +$74M in flows, compared to +$756M for RWL.
Which ETF is more volatile: PY or RWL?
Over the past year, PY had a volatility of 16.84%, while RWL experienced 15.36%.
Which ETF is bigger: PY or RWL?
As of March 10, 2026, PY holds $198.03 M in assets under management (AUM), while RWL manages $8.21 B.
What sectors do the PY and RWL ETFs invest in?
PY leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, RWL focuses on Health Care, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PY ETF and RWL ETF?
PY top holdings include APPLE, AMAZON.COM INC and PROCTERGAMBLE. RWL holds in its top three: WALMART INC, AMAZON.COM INC and UNITEDHEALTH GRP.
Which ETF is more diversified: PY or RWL?
PY holds 98 securities with 30.68% of its assets in the top 15. RWL has 503 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.53%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
