PXHvsLDEMETF Comparison
VS
Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. PXH's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Energy. In contrast, LDEM's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. PXH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.16% for LDEM. PXH is up 17.1% year-to-date (YTD) with +$83M in YTD flows. LDEM performs worse with 5.7% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PXH and LDEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PXH vs LDEM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PXH LDEM | +2.32%-0.25% | +3.51%-0.05% | +17.10%+5.70% | +20.49%+6.48% | +82.15%+52.79% | +64.19%+16.01% |
| Flows | PXH LDEM | +$67M- | +$61M- | +$83M- | +$169M- | +$130M-$25M | +$175M-$765M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PXH LDEM | +12.22%+19.16% | +14.54%+17.87% | +15.01%+15.63% | +15.49%+17.03% |
| Max drawdown | PXH LDEM | -4.44%-8.24% | -9.49%-12.07% | -16.17%-14.33% | -29.08%-36.76% |
| Max drawdown duration | PXH LDEM | 39d87d | 68d204d | 218d219d | 822d1392d |
Trading data
PXH | LDEM | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.69 | $61.23 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $29.27 | $60.27 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PXH | LDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PXH | LDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.69 | $61.23 |
| 1D performance | +1.43% | +1.59% |
| AuM | $2.09 B | $33.64 M |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.16% |
Characteristics
PXH | LDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | iShares |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental Select Emerging Markets 350 Index | MSCI EM Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 358 | 408 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 27, 2007 | February 5, 2020 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PXH
China
33.49%
Taiwan
23.78%
Brazil
11.28%
India
9.66%
Other
21.78%
LDEM
China
30.59%
Taiwan
14.53%
Republic of Korea
12.74%
India
10.6%
Other
31.53%
Sectors
PXH
Finance
29.43%
Technology
23.18%
Energy
11.99%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.22%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.54%
Other
16.64%
LDEM
Finance
30.42%
Technology
23.98%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.62%
Other
35.98%
Advertisement
Diversification
PXH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.41%
LDEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.39%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PXH
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5.85%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
4.15%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
3.21%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.81%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
2.51%
Vale SA
2.29%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.23%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.02%
JD.com, Inc.
1.87%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.57%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.51%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.44%
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
1.09%
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
0.95%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
0.92%
LDEM
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
5.19%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.90%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
4.25%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.04%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.22%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
2.05%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
1.82%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
1.41%
Meituan
1.32%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
1.14%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.09%
NetEase, Inc.
1.02%
Itaú Unibanco Holding SA
1.01%
BYD Co., Ltd.
0.99%
Saudi Arabian Oil Co.
0.95%
Frequently asked questions about PXH and LDEM
How have the PXH and LDEM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, PXH is up 17.1% year-to-date (YTD), while LDEM has returned 5.7%. That puts PXH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PXH or LDEM?
Year-to-date, the PXH ETF saw +$83M in flows, compared to - for LDEM.
Which ETF is more volatile: PXH or LDEM?
Over the past year, PXH had a volatility of 14.54%, while LDEM experienced 17.87%.
Which ETF is bigger: PXH or LDEM?
As of September 17, 2026, PXH holds $2.09 B in assets under management (AUM), while LDEM manages $33.64 M.
What sectors do the PXH and LDEM ETFs invest in?
PXH leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Energy. Meanwhile, LDEM focuses on Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the PXH ETF and LDEM ETF?
PXH top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Petróleo Brasileiro SA and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.. LDEM holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: PXH or LDEM?
PXH holds 358 securities with 34.41% of its assets in the top 15. LDEM has 431 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.39%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
