PXHvsEMXFETF Comparison
VS
Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. PXH's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Energy. In contrast, EMXF's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. PXH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.16% for EMXF. PXH is up 17.15% year-to-date (YTD) with +$83M in YTD flows. EMXF performs better with 25.02% YTD performance, and +$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PXH and EMXF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PXH vs EMXF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PXH EMXF | +3.27%+3.06% | +3.15%-2.53% | +17.15%+25.02% | +21.21%+30.64% | +82.23%+80.67% | +69.55%+52.95% |
| Flows | PXH EMXF | +$67M- | +$61M+$6M | +$83M+$15M | +$169M+$20M | +$130M+$53M | +$175M+$94M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PXH EMXF | +12.20%+20.18% | +14.53%+19.74% | +15.00%+16.04% | +15.42%+16.96% |
| Max drawdown | PXH EMXF | -4.44%-10.85% | -9.49%-12.39% | -16.17%-14.71% | -29.08%-30.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | PXH EMXF | 39d88d | 68d50d | 218d219d | 822d1296d |
Trading data
PXH | EMXF | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.71 | $57.65 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $29.69 | $57.63 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PXH | EMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PXH | EMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.71 | $57.65 |
| 1D performance | +0.07% | +0.03% |
| AuM | $2.09 B | $166.50 M |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.16% |
Characteristics
PXH | EMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | iShares |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental Select Emerging Markets 350 Index | MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 358 | 543 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 27, 2007 | October 6, 2020 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PXH
China
33.49%
Taiwan
23.78%
Brazil
11.28%
India
9.66%
Other
21.78%
EMXF
China
26%
Taiwan
22.16%
Republic of Korea
11.43%
India
11.1%
Other
29.32%
Sectors
PXH
Finance
29.43%
Technology
23.18%
Energy
11.99%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.22%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.54%
Other
16.64%
EMXF
Finance
41.83%
Technology
31.44%
Other
26.73%
Advertisement
Diversification
PXH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.41%
EMXF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.32%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PXH
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5.85%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
4.15%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
3.21%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.81%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
2.51%
Vale SA
2.29%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.23%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.02%
JD.com, Inc.
1.87%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.57%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.51%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.44%
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
1.09%
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
0.95%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
0.92%
EMXF
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
5.12%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.87%
SK hynix, Inc.
3.98%
MediaTek, Inc.
2.70%
China Construction Bank Corp.
1.89%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
1.73%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
1.68%
Xiaomi Corp.
1.28%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
1.19%
Meituan
1.11%
Nu Holdings Ltd.
0.99%
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
0.97%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
0.96%
Al Rajhi Bank
0.92%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
0.92%
Frequently asked questions about PXH and EMXF
How have the PXH and EMXF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, PXH is up 17.15% year-to-date (YTD), while EMXF has returned 25.02%. That puts EMXF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PXH or EMXF?
Year-to-date, the PXH ETF saw +$83M in flows, compared to +$15M for EMXF.
Which ETF is more volatile: PXH or EMXF?
Over the past year, PXH had a volatility of 14.53%, while EMXF experienced 19.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: PXH or EMXF?
As of September 18, 2026, PXH holds $2.09 B in assets under management (AUM), while EMXF manages $166.50 M.
What sectors do the PXH and EMXF ETFs invest in?
PXH leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Energy. Meanwhile, EMXF focuses on Finance and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the PXH ETF and EMXF ETF?
PXH top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Petróleo Brasileiro SA and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.. EMXF holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PXH or EMXF?
PXH holds 358 securities with 34.41% of its assets in the top 15. EMXF has 574 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.32%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
