Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PXEvsLNGXETF Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) belong to the same industry segment: US Energy. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Energy and Utilities. PXE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.61%, versus 0.45% for LNGX. PXE is up 27.25% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4M in YTD flows. LNGX performs worse with 22.01% YTD performance, and +$26M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PXE and LNGX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PXE vs LNGX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PXE LNGX | +8.98%+8.41% | +19.76%+19.32% | +27.25%+22.01% | +34.08%n/a | +46.50%n/a | +150.15%n/a |
| Flows | PXE LNGX | +$74K+$13M | -$3M+$27M | -$4M+$26M | -$14M- | -$114M- | -$46M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PXE LNGX | +28.45%+23.68% | +33.49%n/a | +28.00%n/a | +33.93%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PXE LNGX | -7.55%-5.05% | -23.62%n/a | -37.59%n/a | -37.59%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PXE LNGX | 48d40d | 71dn/a | 703dn/a | 703dn/a |
PXE | LNGX | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.59 | $43.61 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $34.33 | $42.30 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PXE | LNGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PXE | LNGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.59 | $43.61 |
| 1D performance | +3.67% | +3.10% |
| AuM | $91.05 M | $35.27 M |
| E/R | 0.61% | 0.45% |
PXE | LNGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Global X |
| Benchmark | Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production Intellidex Index | Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index |
| N° of holdings | 29 | 32 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 26, 2005 | October 28, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PXE and LNGX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, PXE is up 27.25% year-to-date (YTD), while LNGX has returned 22.01%. That puts PXE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PXE or LNGX?
Year-to-date, the PXE ETF saw -$4M in flows, compared to +$26M for LNGX.
Which ETF is bigger: PXE or LNGX?
As of March 11, 2026, PXE holds $91.05 M in assets under management (AUM), while LNGX manages $35.27 M.
What sectors do the PXE and LNGX ETFs invest in?
PXE leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, LNGX focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the PXE ETF and LNGX ETF?
PXE top holdings include DEVON ENERGY, OCCIDENTAL U and PHILLIPS 66. LNGX holds in its top three: COTERRA ENERGY, EQT and CHESAPEAKE ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: PXE or LNGX?
PXE holds 30 securities with 61.46% of its assets in the top 15. LNGX has 33 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.56%.
War in the Middle East: ETF Movers & Shakers
ETF winners and losers within the U.S. in 2022 (so far)
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
