Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PWVvsCLCVETF Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Value. PWV's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Energy and Health Care. In contrast, CLCV's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Health Care. PWV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.5% for CLCV. PWV is up 4.24% year-to-date (YTD) with +$12M in YTD flows. CLCV performs worse with -0.08% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PWV and CLCV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PWV vs CLCV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PWV CLCV | -1.70%-4.04% | +3.80%+0.18% | +4.24%-0.08% | +22.27%n/a | +67.48%n/a | +82.91%n/a |
| Flows | PWV CLCV | +$13M+$269K | +$24M+$2M | +$12M+$2M | +$134M- | +$163M- | +$205M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PWV CLCV | +9.49%+12.79% | +15.48%n/a | +13.22%n/a | +14.37%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PWV CLCV | -2.85%-4.84% | -12.97%n/a | -14.40%n/a | -16.49%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PWV CLCV | 9d29d | 49dn/a | 192dn/a | 688dn/a |
PWV | CLCV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $69.32 | $26.51 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $69.25 | $26.57 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PWV | CLCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PWV | CLCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $69.32 | $26.51 |
| 1D performance | +0.10% | -0.21% |
| AuM | $1.34 B | $13.55 M |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.5% |
PWV | CLCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Crossmark Global Investment |
| Benchmark | Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 51 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 3, 2005 | July 23, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PWV and CLCV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, PWV is up 4.24% year-to-date (YTD), while CLCV has lost -0.08%. That puts PWV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PWV or CLCV?
Year-to-date, the PWV ETF saw +$12M in flows, compared to +$2M for CLCV.
Which ETF is bigger: PWV or CLCV?
As of March 11, 2026, PWV holds $1.34 B in assets under management (AUM), while CLCV manages $13.55 M.
What sectors do the PWV and CLCV ETFs invest in?
PWV leans toward sectors like Financials, Energy and Health Care. Meanwhile, CLCV focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the PWV ETF and CLCV ETF?
PWV top holdings include EXXON, CHEVRON TEXACO and IE000S9YS762. CLCV holds in its top three: EXXON, BK OF AMERICA CO and CISCO-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: PWV or CLCV?
PWV holds 50 securities with 49.84% of its assets in the top 15. CLCV has 51 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.44%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
